-
Posts
2,057 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Kiipu
-
That would indicate the WARRIOR stamp was not that of a sword fitting shop then?
-
"I think" your right! 島田義助作 Shimada Yoshisuke saku. The WARRIOR stamp has also been noted on blades made by Yoshichika 吉近. I think the logo could belong to a either a forge or sword retailer located in Seki. Yoshichika katana with REALLY Odd Stamp in English!
-
The lineage chart of Hiromasa courtesy of @Stephen. Yoshū Hōjō-jū Hiromasa katana in shingunto koshirae
-
Below is a link to an early "Star" stamp from the same smith. This particular blade is dated October 1942. Note the different mix of inspection stamps. Mal's tome mentioned above goes into this in more detail. Can anyone translate this?
-
Hiromasa 博正 was from Ehime Prefecture 愛媛県. The 昭 stamp was only used in Gifu Prefecture. So it would be impossible for it to be that stamp. For more information about Hiromasa and Ehime Prefecture, I would suggest taking a look at the monograph below. Showa Period Swordsmiths of Ehime Prefecture
-
Japanese WW2 Era Navy Kai Gunto, curious on your thoughts
Kiipu replied to Kintepro's topic in Military Swords of Japan
I did not see it mentioned, so translated the name of the swordsmith. 平田秀光 = Hirata Hidemitsu. A link to one of his blades in a naval mount. Sword in Naval Mounts And another with a mystery anchor stamp. Nakago Stamp -
The location you marked is usually where the "Star" stamp was located. If the sword came via Japan in the postwar years, the "Star" stamp could have been removed, so as to register the sword with the authorities. Wartime stamps were frowned upon, including the "Star" stamp.
-
@Spartancrest
-
I think the picture is upside down. The right column of kanji characters could be some sort of number? 一ノ一七七 ノ = katakana NO.
-
I found two other swords by this swordsmith. @Markus Below is the first one. Not much other than the characters. Interpreting kanji on samurai sword The second one is in naval fittings, same as the one in the OP. It is over at auctree, item b1106655914. I will post the link but it will come up forbidden. It has the same style habaki as the OP. https://aucfree.com/m/items/b1106655914
-
A three part interview of Paul Martin conducted by Shohei Nagatsuji of Japan-Forward.com. Interview
- 1 reply
-
- 6
-
-
-
New variation of extended/patented ishizuke?
Kiipu replied to RobCarter3's topic in Military Swords of Japan
Maybe your thinking of the following stamp(s). Arsenal Stamps. -
實用新案特許 = jitsuyō shin'an tokkyo = Utility Model Patent. 第213917番 = No. 213917. No. = Number.
-
New variation of extended/patented ishizuke?
Kiipu replied to RobCarter3's topic in Military Swords of Japan
新案特許 Shin'an tokkyo Patent on a new device. -
Sword tassel help please - genuine or reproduction?
Kiipu replied to RussellM's topic in Military Swords of Japan
Not to be overlooked is a rather obscure comment made by Akira Komiya. 額縁 Gakubuchi Sword tassel - genuine or reproduction? -
Hi Junxi and welcome to the forum. If the blade length is as below, then it is an Otsu 乙 version. Overall length with scabbard: 933mm or 36.75 inches. Blade length: 774mm or 30.5 inches. The year of original manufacture was 1912. Of the initial two inspection marks, the one on the left is 平. Which back then would be a character from the inspector's name. At some later date, it was arsenal overhauled by Kokura Arsenal and hence the additional 小 inspection mark. 大一 = 1912. FYI, my first Japanese sword was a Type 32 and I think they were a good design. However, having swung one around a few times, one quickly realizes the shortcomings of a single-handed sword. In my case, the weak link was my wrist. It is surprising the Japanese did not realize this sooner. Officer's abandoned the single-handed sword during World War I, except of course for the cavalry. Take good care of that sword, it is a nice addition to your collection. Time to start looking for a 甲 version to go along with it!
-
Windows 8.1 Open a photograph in Microsoft Paint. This can be done by right-clicking the image file, scrolling down to “Open with” and clicking on “Paint.” The program will automatically open and should be on the “Home” tab. If not on the “Home” tab, then click on the "Home" tab. In the "Image" section, second from the left, click on “Resize” and a popup window will appear. In the “Resize” section in the top half of the popup window, make sure there is a check-mark in the “Maintain aspect ratio.” For most cellphone and camera photographs, enter the number 25 in either the Horizontal or Vertical row. The number entered will automatically appear in the other row. [For small size photographs, use a larger number. For large size images, use a lower number.] Click on “OK.” The resized picture is now viewable in the work space of MS Paint. In the upper left corner, click on the “File” tab. From the popup window, click on “Save as” and select a file format. [Selecting “JPEG picture” will work best for most forums.] Then select a location to save the file to, give the file a name, and finally click on “Save.”
- 1 reply
-
- 3
-
-
-
That could very well be the case. Both brass and steel tsubas show up in this Suya range; however, they always have numbered scabbards. Below is Kobe, serial 47961, for comparison. Arsenal Stamps.
-
New sword owner needs help identifying and confirming auth.
Kiipu replied to GenesisFactor's topic in Nihonto
Search Terms Type 95 Military Sword, Kokura Arsenal, Gifu, Gunto. Type 98 with leather scabbard, Seki swordsmith, Mishina. 義明 Yoshiaki. 昭和十六年 1941. -
The serial number is 49810 and falls within the range used by Suya. I agree with "John C" that the scabbard is a replacement, either lost or damaged beyond repair. The scabbard inspection marks are as follows. 東 社 (This stamp is either struck at an angle or broken.)
-
Bibliography of Japanese Modern Edged Weapons, 1868-1945
Kiipu replied to Kiipu's topic in Military Swords of Japan
Cox, Malcolm E. Showa Period Swordsmiths of Fukuoka Prefecture, Kyushu, and the Kokura Arsenal. 2024. A4 size, 149 pages, B&W & color illustrations. Besides gendai Fukuoka swordsmiths, this study also covers the arsenal markings used on RJT blades made under the supervision of Kokura Army Arsenal. For this reason, it covers some of the surrounding prefectures under the jurisdiction of Kokura Army Arsenal. This is the first serious English language study of this aspect of wartime blade production. -
Found you another picture to look at, second down from the top. Note the type of tassel used. WW2 Japanese Army training yearbook