Hi guys wondering if you could help me clear up a problem I'm having in my study.
I'm learning about the characteristics of blades from various traditions, schools, smiths and putting together a single reference spread sheet for myself to help with kantei and as a way to try and make it sink in..... . I'm using the following books as reference material; - 'Connoisseurs', 'Nihonto Koza', 'Hawleys sword groups' and various others Compton collection, cutting edge, Japanese sword, plus various nihonto info sites like Rob Coles etc
It seems that one book's mokume is another's itame... for example
For the Yamato Senjuin scool the jihada traits are described as -
Hawleys; Large midare masame hada
Nihonto Koza; Itame with a taste of masame with jinie
Connoisseurs; Mokume hada mixed with jinie and chikei.
Shoshin; ITAME or ITAME-MASA mix, finely done. Can be strong and with O-HADA. JI-NIE.
This difference in description happens in many references through most schools, 'Con' says mokume, 'Nk' says itame and occasionally mokume
Would I be correct in saying that earlier books like Nihonto koza (translated from early references) would be less liberal with describing a hada as mokume, where as later books might refer to it more so?
Is there a book or source (maybe that i don't have) that is more correct than others?
One other question if I could Yamato described (loosely) as itame and mokume seen but usually a nagare - hada (running) combined with masame? Q;What makes a hada "running"
thanks in advance
Rich T 2