Jump to content

David Flynn

Members
  • Posts

    2,682
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by David Flynn

  1. Don't forget, the Japanese made copies of all periods. This is one of the Nihonto Minefields.
  2. signed Katana mei.
  3. Late Muramachi Mino, Kanenobu?
  4. When Tsurata says "Sword was polished", it means he polished it. Otherwise, he says, "sword was professionally polished".
  5. Unfortunately, it's suriage, with the last couple of Kanji missing. But it has a hozon paper.
  6. I have a Shodai Hojoji Masahiro Katana. He was a contemporary of Kotetsu. In kantei, he has been mistaken for Kotetsu.
  7. Bryce, as this Tanto is dated 1943, I would assume it's Dai Saku, Dai Mei. Sadakatsu died in Dec. 1943 and I'm led to believe he wasn't well for quite awhile before he passed.
  8. I have noticed from Face Book, that Markus is involved with another project at present. So, I was wondering if and when this book will ever be completed? I believe it's time to cancel this project and return the funds.
  9. Also, this is a full Signature Emura.
  10. John, that's not fumbari. It's just tapering. When you see actual Fumbari, you will see the difference.
  11. From what I've noticed, Sadakatsu, used Ayasugi, Itame and Masame. I believe the use of Masamune den, just means Soshu, and just an advertising ploy. Also, Masame, is usually used with Yamato den.
  12. Actually, viewing swords and reading the books should be done together. Unfortunately, unless one has access to many, many swords, it's very hard to learn. Ideally, having a mentor is the way to go.
  13. Possibly Shinto era. Unfortunately, it's very low quality. It has at least, 2 blisters ( Fukure)in the Ji.
  14. Wilf, I saw one identical to this (maybe) for sale in Japan at the DTI, a few years ago. It was still in it's original box and never mounted. The price was 3.5 million yen.
  15. Michael, the Koshizori you mention is for Kamakura period Koshizori. As time went on, the Koshizori became more and more shallow. To check if it's Tori or Koshi, run a string (or whatever) line from the Nakago Jiri to the tip of the Kissaki. This will tell you where the deepest point is. It will also show up Koshizori. Also, this was truly O Suriage, then the Koshi, would be gone.
  16. I have a feeling that, this could be a Shinshinto copy. I have come to this opinion because, 1. the Hada. 2. the Sugata. and 3. the placement of the Mekugi ana ( which also appear to be drilled).
  17. Brian, traditionally made swords, were produced to the very end of the war. Admittedly, they became fewer and fewer. I have seen some very good swords made in 1945.
  18. it looks like the shinogi has been rounded and the yokote is gone. Unless this is dirt cheap, I would pass. Sooner or later, when you realise what a decently polished sword looks like, you will become frustrated with it. Kanehisa is a good smith. However, this really does need a professional polish, which even in America would cost a couple of K. I would consider, is the sword worth the cost of the restoration? If not I would definitely pass.
  19. May I suggest you look at some other Threads, to see what kind of photo's are needed.
  20. Is there any provenance with it, besides the story of how it was traded?
  21. Victorian by name, Victorian by nature.
  22. From the shape, I'd be looking around the 1660s.
  23. Nakago (Tang) is upside down and hard to read. I think it could be Ido Hidetoshi.
  24. Not Fukure (Blisters). These are Ware.
×
×
  • Create New...