Hello,
According to my little knowledge on that topic I can tell you that it is not a real hitai-ate/hachigane but a copy. I already saw some like that and I think that it was made in the Taisho/Showa period. Of course, it is my personal opinion.
Dear follow collectors,
I am trying to translate a mei from a hira zukuri tanto with a hitatsura hamon.
If you can help on this one, I will appreciate a lot.
For the swordsmith name, it seems to start by "BI" but is it Bizen ????
For the date, It starts with" EI" but I can't figure out the following kanji......
The sword belt seems to be legit but.....we have to keep in mind that a shop in Japan used to sale some for reenactment (Nakata) and those belt are now over 40 years old.
About the chain, it's an original one, but, quite a lot of countries used some. My guess is that this chain is legit.
Very nice shin-gunto, all complete with a family mon. I have never seen such markings on this kind of hanger. But, when you collect Japanese militaria and samurai swords you are always surprised. it is original for sure.
Take care Brian. Getting old is not simple, I feel it everyday.
The nakago and mei seems to be like one from the Meiji era, narrow nakago, big kanji.......
Like John said, it seems that parts from different origins have been put together. The ishizuke is a fake, the brass type on the bottom of the saya comes from a NCO sword as Rob said. The tsuka (kabutogane and fuchi) seems genuine. The nakago seems too short for the length of the tsuka.......
A Frankenstein sword...............!