Jump to content

PNSSHOGUN

Gold Tier
  • Posts

    5,977
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

Everything posted by PNSSHOGUN

  1. Value is likely what you paid for it, the older papers are not taken too seriously any more. Looks like a well made dagger at the very least.
  2. Very interesting sword, I believe the smith is Hojoji Tachibana Nagakuni. There is a known relationship between this smith and the sword tester Yamano Hisahide, see the below thread for more information:
  3. Well put Sam, the serial offender(s) should honestly be ashamed at this point. If common decency is completely lacking, many would welcome moderator action.
  4. There's a glimpse of Hada in one of the photos that would suggest Shin Shinto, however the rest of the sword suggests it was made closer to Nanbokucho.
  5. Basing it off the Mei is more reasonable as Horimono may be Atobori, and many original Horimono didn't stop above the Habaki. Your best bet would be to find an Ubu example of this same smith and compare the Mei placement.
  6. More on the subject of sword prices during the Shin Shinto era: https://markussesko.com/2019/09/06/breakdown-of-price-for-sword-blade/
  7. Hi Kenny, welcome to the forum. To begin this is a Type 98 made circa 1943, the small stamp indicates it's non-traditional.
  8. You will also find similar interpretations (changing to Suguha in the Monouchi) in Muramasa and Yokoyama Bizen works.
  9. Horii Toshihide was a very good Gendai smith, there is plenty of information about him on the board and online if you search his name. You would want closer pictures of the Mei and date for comparison to authentic examples.
  10. From memory it sold privately for a number in the hundreds of thousands.
  11. If such things are so rare perhaps it would be worth making a small video of it in action?
  12. It's certainly a nice sword but at this point you could have very nice swords at the Juyo level that also include original Koshirae and provenance. Sue Bizen Kiyomitsu does not jump at out most people for that money.
  13. The two Yasunori smiths were the most prolific smiths combined, at any given time they're the most encountered Yasukuni-To on the market.
  14. Looks more likely to have been made by his plumber.
  15. Have often wondered about Nakago with these large chunks missing, was it fire damage, weight reduction, rust, a hitherto unknown rat species that feeds on Nakago....? The forerunner may be salt water corrosion as you see it on swords mounted for WWII where such exposure could be frequent.
  16. For what it's worth you sometimes see a similar overall composition of a Kitsune admiring its reflection under moonlight.
  17. Thank you for the vote of confidence, however the purposed tassel treatise has fallen way, way, way by the wayside. Will dust off the draft and see what can be salvaged.
  18. Have to agree with Jacques, even the very best photos pale to the real thing at these levels. Some dealers are doing videos which are a big improvement, certainly helpful for summary studying of a blade for research or Kantei practice. However it seems absolutely nuts to me spending that amount on a sword without being able to view it hand at leisure.
  19. Well that isn't a cavalry model, probably just the officers preference.
  20. The Mei looks like "長義 - Nagayoshi "
  21. Appears to be a Murata-To, a non-traditional oil tempered blade that were common for Kyu Gunto.
  22. There was a Maj. General Omoto Kimio - 尾本喜三雄, however he is listed as being stationed in Sumatra by wars end. Looks like some interesting provenance, thanks for sharing Geoff.
  23. Hi David, unfortunately this appears to be a Chinese fake. The style of the handle wrap, fittings, and tang, are all wrong and rather crude.
×
×
  • Create New...