Jump to content

BANGBANGSAN

Members
  • Posts

    1,585
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by BANGBANGSAN

  1. Besides 湊川神社(Minatogowa Jinja),四条畷神社(Shijonawate Jinja)in Osaka also uses 菊水紋( Kikusui Mon). Many families also adopt the Kikusui Mon as their crest. https://irohakamon.c...on/kiku/kikusui.html
  2. Do you have the link to this sword?
  3. This is an interesting one, has both an anchor and a 岐 mark. These are all the photos of this sword that are on Facebook. Smith 兼玄 Kaneharu Date 昭和二十年五月 1945 May
  4. 1.豐州高田住藤原行長 Hoshu Takada Ju Fujiwara Yukinaga 2.助宗 SukeMune
  5. I came across this Type 95 on Facebook. Interestingly, the serial number is situated on the opposite side. This is the first one of its kind that I have ever seen.
  6. Could it be 重富 Shigetomi?
  7. Thanks, Conway!
  8. Could you post a photo of the tag?
  9. Maybe you should read this info about Mantestu sword http://ohmura-study.net/998.html In my previous response on the other thread, this sword is a presentation sword given to their employee. Apart from the signature (mei) containing that information, it is a standard-made Mantetsu sword. They made around 35000(maybe a little more) Mantetsu swords during 7 years, we are uncertain about the exact number of these swords that were gifted; I speculate not too many, perhaps a couple hundred or so? However, yours is the only one that has surfaced by far.
  10. レ五二四 =Re 524
  11. Nicholas Thanks for posting the ser#.I saw this sword posted on a Facebook group not long ago. I was interested in purchasing it, but the guy mentioned to me the seller who prefers dealing with buyers in person.
  12. @Kiipu Mauro & Conway nail it
  13. Dan PLease post some photos after you get it
  14. I do not have content for article 11, maybe Thomas can help?
  15. @Bruce Pennington That 特 (Special)mark is one of the Extraordinary stamps.
  16. John Found another work by 伊奈波 兼波之作, this one without cutting off the mei. Comparing it to the one I posted earlier with a partially cut-off mei, the signature does not appear to be carved by the same individual.
  17. here is Army 陸軍捻(諸捻卷)vs Navy Tachi style (平卷)
  18. Correction: it should be vertical 一一八 instead of 天
  19. It says“陸軍捻“=the army (style) wrapping
  20. Thanks,zac.#2-エ 三六七 was mine, it's in the database already.It's here the page 2
×
×
  • Create New...