Jump to content

BANGBANGSAN

Members
  • Posts

    1,531
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by BANGBANGSAN

  1. It looks like 時
  2. 昭和四(十)叁年十二月贰拾九日 Showa 43 years(1968)12.29
  3. Not likely.It's 鋼 for Steel.
  4. Colonel uniform from 偕行社特約 中本洋服店( 松山)
  5. 濃州関住後藤兼廣作
  6. Thomas Add one more, not mine.
  7. 昭和十五年八月
  8. Steve One more red bean(with the gold coat on the drag?) on 95.
  9. 昭和六十年 would be 1985
  10. Takehisa normally sold for $1000-1300, Mantetsu would be double. https://www.ebay.com/itm/MINTY-WWII-Japanese-Samurai-Sword-SHIN-GUNTO-World-War-2-KATANA-WW2-BLADE/373517288112?hash=item56f75d82b0:g:OPIAAOSwf5RgYJtW This one is way high.
  11. The tag say's 铃木大尉 Suzuki Captain
  12. Yep,that's him。
  13. looks cut off
  14. 2nd Photo- LV Luggage Set
  15. Sold for $600 .I remember saw the one sold for 750 as well.
  16. Monkey just list this NCO sword as a rare prototype https://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-PROTOTYPE-WWII-Japanese-Army-officers-samurai-sword-NCO-LEATHER-SCABBAR/114737295938 Actually, he just bought an NCO sword without a handle from eBay and put a handle on it, now he is trying to scam people. What a shame. Original sell https://www.ebay.com/itm/Imperial-Japan-Type-95-NCO-Gunto-sword-/393110215827
  17. Saw these photos of a 略装 98, ONLY 3 photos NO other photos. It had the K 171 assemble number on all the parts, and a Star mark on the tang, but the guy state there is NO signature Or Date other than the star stamp, the blade length is 55cm.
  18. Not in hand yet,I have friend in Japan bought it for me.
  19. Still searching for the one with right price
  20. Still searching
  21. Bought Ohmura Tomoyuki 大村・紀征. Shinsetsu tatakau Nihontō 真説 戦う日本刀 [True Theory, Japanese Fighting Sword:]. BAB Japan, 2019.
  22. Yes, I agree with you, Steve. That is not standard for 95's. Even though the patina looks old, I still think the washer is a very big chance postwar mod instead of wartime fixed.
  23. 正輝 研(Polish)
  24. Looks like 造兵刀
  25. Very possible!The number maybe 277 or 271?
×
×
  • Create New...