-
Posts
1,595 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by BANGBANGSAN
-
Help identify old sword and it’s origin!
BANGBANGSAN replied to Bryan_h15's topic in Military Swords of Japan
豐州高田住藤原行久作 -
正真甲伏鍛正房作 真金入 實用新案登錄 第二一一六五九号
-
兼友作
-
35974 VS 35479 seems they only flip the numbers a bit.
-
-
関住岡田兼義作
-
Possible Type 94 - Looking for information
BANGBANGSAN replied to Pineview Surplus's topic in Military Swords of Japan
Smith name 石原兼直 Ishihara Kanenao,WW2 関市 Seki sword smith ,make sword for Army,there is no date on this sword. During WWII, more than 200 swordsmiths worked only at Seki province to supply qualified swords for their soldiers. Their names began to appear in Seki Tanrensho Booklet printed in 1939. Several smiths in this list worked as Rikugun Jumei Tosho (e.g. Nakata Kanehide) and produced both good and poor blades together. However, most of these seki smiths produced low grade Showato and should not be regarded as a Gendaito. http://www.jp-sword.com/files/seki/gendaito.html -
Possible Type 94 - Looking for information
BANGBANGSAN replied to Pineview Surplus's topic in Military Swords of Japan
濃州関住石原兼直作 NoShu SekiJu Ishihara Kanenao Saku -
Is this a type 98 with a type 95 blade?
BANGBANGSAN replied to Adam001's topic in Military Swords of Japan
I have a solid Tusba one. See the compared with the early one, later one has longer Tsuba . Also, the later 造兵刀 has 東 inspection mark instead of ホ,セ and Tokyo Cannonball mark, and is always one the 裏 side of tang along with the assemble number, the early 造兵刀 has arsenal mark in the 表 side of the tang. -
Is this a type 98 with a type 95 blade?
BANGBANGSAN replied to Adam001's topic in Military Swords of Japan
It is a later 造兵刀 made by Tokyo Arsenal, the assemble number 七八(78) on the tang matches 鍔&切羽。 The extra hole on the tang and none army standard issue 兜金 indicates the handle was remount. Agree with what John says, don't buy it unless it's cheap. -
少佐刀帶 岡道
-
相當佐官 Equivalent to Field officer
-
Thomas You are correct!The rest is 佐官 正绪 Field Officer Formal Tassel 小號 Size Small 准(银?)壹 Second Rate(Silver?) One
-
Attention Mantetsu Owners: A Survey
BANGBANGSAN replied to Bruce Pennington's topic in Military Swords of Japan
https://www.ebay.com/itm/124947464368?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT This 滿洲國有鐵道 Manchuko National Railway Gunto without scabbard sold for $2800, it's going to China. -
Wwii Japanese Sword With A Tachi Blade From Kamakura Period?
BANGBANGSAN replied to cplnorton's topic in Nihonto
Tsuka marking is 柄平卷 The company logo it's very similar to 山本軍刀店,but a little different. It look like 幸 rather than 山本, maybe another logo for 神户軍刀店?Since the owner‘s name 神户一幸。We know 合名會社 神戶商店 make Type 95 NCO sword using K or 一 inside the Cherry blossom mark, perhaps not many people know it also called 神戶軍刀店(hence they both use the same phone number)? -
The photo is too small,I can only make a guess-陸軍造?
-
昭和己卯年(Showa 14),1939.No season on this one.
-
This one is correctly stamped.
-
-
Is's a repro
-
-
Type 98 being considered - help needed with translation
BANGBANGSAN replied to Kolekt-To's topic in Military Swords of Japan
備前國住長船祐定作 大永六年八月吉日 -
As a 造兵刀&NCO sword lover, I've been observing the price for many years(also bought many), like John said that 造兵刀 sold for$2000 was all because it's the minty condition, so does the recent two mint condition Type 95 sold for over 2K, keep that in mind, the regular condition ones will NOT be sell for that kind of price.
-
This is a early 造兵刀 http://ohmura-study.net/206.html
