BANGBANGSAN

Found 觀耕台(farming observe platform） https://www.meet99.com/jingdian-xiannongtan-36495.html

@Stegel Ernie What do you think about this scabbard?Paint or wrapped with white cloth?

Not sure if that scabbard was painted white or wrapped with the white cloth

It looks like Guadalcanal, Okinawa, 3RD Bm, and other stuff.

Some photos will help, but from what you describe, both blades in Type 94 and Type 98 don't sound like Zohei-to.

警視廳 Metropolitan Police Department mark

This ons has "示“mark and 警視廳 Metropolitan Police Department mark。

@Shamsy Steve Found a red bean paint Type 30 scabbard.

Looks like 村田刀 to me

Type 19 from grey blanket

Any photos?

The "8" mark maybe from Hiroshima Arsenal

Thanks Thomas!

Anyone know about this mark?

@Bruce Pennington Bruce I'm afraid there is no "shop logo" for 川越製造所 Kawagoe Factory. It is not a civilian contractor shop for the Army, but the factory owned and operated by IJA locate in 埼玉県上福岡市 Saitama Prefecture Kamifukuoka city. https://senseki-kikou.net/?p=9774&amp=1

That ワ mark could be from 川越製造所 Kawagoe factory under 東京第一陸軍造兵廠 Tokyo first arsenal.

Saw this 吉 mark on a Navy dirk, any idea what sword shop might be? @Kiipu

Chinese collectors buy Japanese and Chinese swords from all over the world. Many type 95 NCO swords, Mantetsu, and Yasukuni swords went to China, that's one of the reasons the price of those swords keep going up. They only buy and don't sell. Nowadays many Chinese(not all of course) don't like people from other countries, especially Americans, they think China and Russia are the greatest. Most collectors don't like to share their knowledge with others. There are only very few sword books written by Chinese, the collectors in China check Ohmura's website, and use Dawson&Fuller's book(Pirate Chinese version)also Japanese sword books for reference.

Agree!

Thomas Can you point out where this info came from? Do you have the full sheet? Thanks

Talking about no habaki, Type 32 also have no habaki.

Hey Tom Do you have more photos of your 2 repurposes 95s? Are they both have NO habaki and added the extra hole on the tang? Do both have the date?

The sticker says the Mei of the blade is 肥後國同田貫宗廣作， can't see that on the tang of this blade. It also said the handle should have kamon. So, maybe this scabbard is not the original to this sword?

Bruce I know it's probably not, but the mark under the numbers is kind of like a 菅 inspection mark on some of Kokura Arsenal-made Type 30 bayonets.

It's legit