timelag

This sword has been listed in the book of "300 pieces precious Chinese antique weapon", the book will publish next month

Collection must relate to two value:business value and artistic value. Like playing poker, if there is no stake, the player will feel boring soon.Similarly, the collector are also provoked by the increase in value or depreciation of their collection. At the mean time, just like someone said, a stone at 2000 years ago is worthless since it has no artictic value at all.But for a sword 2000 years ago, which reprent most advanced technology at that time, and you can find lots of information from that, Grind the sword is easy, but at the same time, you will not find if it is new or old, you can judge the degree of errosion of iron and bronze, and the artificial errosion is easy to distinguish with hundred years' errosion. And the the head of this sword, the ring is really a difficult task at that time, of course, this sword is made for the senior officer at ancient time, no one will make so complicated sword for slave.

I also appreicate the information last night which come from the book, which give me help to judge and study this weapon

Thank you, that is the reasonable opinion. I price an item, any of you can just leave it or forget about it, but what I have seen is only junk word.

please also prove they are fake

How to pricing an item is my right, No one will oblige someone to buy it, is that right?

There are no men dare to accept this gamble? I can burden travelling charge if anyone of you can come to Beijing confirming me why they are fake

By the way, if they are fake, I will cook them and eat them all,

To be frank, I feel disappointed with this forum, I thought people who love antique weapon will also have broad mind, while things are not what it should be. If you come to China, you will know what is happening now, the on line antique weapon bidding held every week, and millions of turnover has accured. I do not think rich people are stupid than others... anyway good luck

Dear Guido, Thanks for your opinion, of course Mr.Huang Pujiang is the biggest Chinese antique weapon collector,but if you know him, I think you also know Mr.Liang YiRen and Mr.Lao Du, they are his biggest supplier, I purchase these antique from these two guys. Ok, then, if someone can just distinguish these are fake through photo, I really appreicate his professionalism, if someone here can prove the antique are fake (the proof), I will give him 10000usd for what he had done, but if not, please keep silent. Best Regards Charlie

Qing dynasty royal sword

tks for your kindness,if not bother,i will post a few of my collection for your reference

Yes,that is my name

yes, i am at beijing

I paid half million RMB equal to 80,000USD for that dragon ruler

Brian, tks for your advise, i know that is impossible.to sell it via internet, i just send this picture out,hope to envoke some intetest of collector

sure, that is a problem, this sword has no ducument attached

what do you think of this, I just pay half million for this roral dragon ruler

The price is not a big problem, there will always be someone will pay for something at a price that others think unblievable, how can we judge the price for a national treasure

I am an ancient Chinese weapon collector, I found this sword 10 years ago

there are two possibilities：1.this sword is from Japan, maybe a fighter travelled at China and left this sword at China, since Tang Dynasty, China and Japan had very frequent communication 2.The sword now at Japan is from China, since China has more advanced technology at ancient time

no, it is not exactly the one placed at Japanese shrine, but even the dimension are the same

http://www.pref.nagasaki.jp/bunkadb/index.php/view/378

Nope, I bought this from a rural place, it is the same as national treasure of Japan

the fighter is Yoshichiro，and the same sword is at a Japanese shrine. my name is Charlie, this sword is 2million usd