Bruce Pennington

Brian - can you move this to the Military Forum, please? I'm not expert on the police swords, but when this gets to the Military forum, you might get some better advice. To me, it looks legit. Pretty beat up, but probably legit. I could be wrong, though, as I don't study these.

Yes, that unusual tsuba we discussed on your thread Unusual Open Work Tsuba. Now you made me notice the tsuba on your original post, above. The hole for the latch looks like it was originally rectangular, but then was drilled out in a round hole! You've got a couple of unusual tsuba, Didier!

Wow Trystan, you earned your pay today!!! Thank you my friend! I'll add that Japan Steel Works, Ltd. logo to the stamps doc.

Pierced tsuba we’re present throughout the war. The early ones were thicker so if you measure the width, it might indicate an earlier one. I don’t remember the dimensions of fat and thinner, but John does.

Is the blade signed?

Phil, safe to assume no date on the other side? Also, 2 holes - is it in standard military fittings?

I guess I've never seen one disassembled. I'm surprised to see that it is a screw holding these on. Is that normal?

We saw a similar one before. Had that same stamp and mei on the nakago. Does yours have standard navy dirk fittings? @BANGBANGSAN

Hello Matt! Sorry about your bad news. Most, if not all, of us made the same mistake early on in our collecting careers. I've still got my poor fake! Spend some time drooling over the pristine examples of real swords on Ohmura's site. Once used to seeing the real thing, the fakes will stand out better when you encounter them: Military Swords of Imperial Japan - Ohmura China is not the only country putting out fakes. Poland and India are also known for them.

A Type 98, Nobumitsu, found by @Shadow_Frog HERE:

This is what Sesko has on him: "NOBUMITSU (信光), Shōwa (昭和, 1926-1989), Gifu – “Nobumitsu” (信光), real name Sakō Shin´ichi (佐光信一), born June 24th 1905, student of Kojima Katsumasa (小島勝正), he worked as guntō smith and died July 21st 1993, ryōkō no retsu (Akihide)" Waiting to see the small stamp at the top, but it's likely to be a Showa stamp, which puts this blade into the 1935-1942 date range (most likely 1940-41). A good many of his blades have been found in civil fittings, which might explain the 2 ana (holes) in this nakago, as it was obviously re-fitted during the war. Hard to put a dollar value, but $1,000 plus or minus a couple hundred is a good ball park, depending upon your budget.

OOOOOO ..... this is a 1939 blade! Waiting for pictures!

I see what you are seeing, John, but in my experience, the large Seki stamp is always (I know - never say never nor always!) on the other side of the shinogi line, like this: I think there is a removed star on the other side:

As a temporary measure (or permanent if you like it) you can buy wooden/bamboo chopsticks and cut to fit. There are a few for sale on ebay. I bought a set of 3 that way myself, a while back. Pricey, but good ones, From Japan (price includes shipping) Cheap, but not darkened (something you could do yourself) "Black horn" mekugi; mid-priced I imagine some of the dealers might sell some quality ones.

Guy, at W-A, said: "高塚 Takatsuka / Kōtsuka /Kōzuka 尾崎 Ozaki"

And that was 1938! I believe Ohmura mentions the practice in passing, though I don't think he placed it in a timeframe. I've grown more cautious these days in labeling odd swords as fake. I know they are out there, and some of them are quite obvious. But I'm certain there have been many swords that fell into the category of the book quote that have been mistakenly called fake, over the years. @BANGBANGSAN - The quote doesn't specify, are the swords being made for Japanese or Chinese troops?

A black painted officer sword posted by RonR on this Wehrmacht-awards Thread. Solid provenance says it was never in post-war G.I. or collector's hands, meaning it is in wartime condition:

Akira Komiya made a very interesting post today on this Wehrmacht-awards Thread. He covered a number of topics ranging from army tsuba, to RS and Zoheito, issue of Type 95s to officers. Here's the part about the army tsuba gold plating: "I checked the specifications of the Type 94 and Type 98 swords regarding the piercing of the Tsuba and found that there is no mention of piercing so it is possible that such was an optional feature. (The specifications only state that there should be four raised engraving cherry blossoms on all four corners of both the obverse and reverse of the Tsuba and does not specify that the Tsuba be pierced.) As for your sword, in the history of the Type 94/ 98 officer's swords, 1941 would not be considered "early" as it would already have seen various austerity measures applied in connection with the rapid expansion of the armed forces and the commensurate increase in the demand for swords as well as the shift towards the wartime economy. For example, the specifications for both the Type 94 and Type 98 swords specify that the Tsuba be made of gold plated brass but the use of gold plating would later be abolished in connection with a series of directives issued by the Ministry of Finance in 1937 and 1938."

Ok, thanks guys!

Dated 1817, earliest one I've seen. Are you saying it's gimei?

It seems so random.

I'm guessing the stamp was of a forge, in a similar fashion to Amahide's Tan Rej Jo. He had a hotstamp that has been seen on 4 other smiths' blades that worked at his forge. Maybe @mecox can confirm that Yoshisuke and Yoshichika worked together at a single forge/shop?

Really cool to see the matching number painted on the saya liner! Great sword, Adam!

Nice looking gunto, Mick. For guys that love the leather covers, this is a plus, as it's pretty rare to see one that still has the leather retention tab on the tsuka. Good luck with the sale.

Ok, I only have blades of 3 of the others. Two look to be suguha hamon, but the third is almost identical to yours Suguha Didn't record source, but I think this was from AOI Art This was posted by Mathias_AC at Wehrmacht-awards Here's the one with similar hamon, found on a Komonjo sale: