Jump to content

Bruce Pennington

Gold Tier
  • Posts

    14,016
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    169

Everything posted by Bruce Pennington

  1. Thanks, Sam! I realize this is at the Vegas Gun Show. Is it too late for photos of the overall blade and fittings for the file? @Kiipu @BANGBANGSAN
  2. Sorry, I know I'm not John, but if there is a back layer it's counted, so 32. Just like the 5 petal sakura on police swords vs the 10 (5 with back layer) on army swords.
  3. Looks like something custom-made for a court official the back strap is field grade or general officer level, or the equivalent civilian ranking.
  4. A photo for those without the book:
  5. Yes, The tsuka looked like it was found without ito/menuki and was wrapped with some sort of other material. Seemed leather-like, but not sure. So, either a field repair of a not-too-bad Bubba job after the war.
  6. Using this thread as a central point for these, now. Just came across another one on a late-war kaigunto - mumei; Navy anchor stamp; matching numbers 799 in paint, on parts, and stamped number on nagako "0 799". Sorry I didn't take more pictures, just was in a rush with a few other swords to photograph.
  7. Excellent, Peter, thanks for the links!
  8. Peter, Do you mean on an internet search, or NMB search? I have two on file. This one, a 1936 Hisakatsu posted by @Volker62 And this 1936 posted by KungFuey:
  9. Linking to one posted by @Rawa
  10. Very cool - 876. I also have a Feb 1942 blade of his stamped 875! Yes, very early in the contingency model production and probably just prior to his acceptance into the RJT program. Good luck with the sale, Leen. Nice blade.
  11. Vedran, The Showa stamp was used by the civilian Seki Cutlery Manufacturers Association on inspected blades between 1935 - 1942. Most dated blades were made in 1940 - 1941. The hamon (temper line) is quite flamboyant! I like it. Care and Cleaning: Japanese Sword Care - Japaneseswordindex.com
  12. Yes, they like to run numbers in the 30,000, 40,000, and 50,000 range however those are also legitimate numbers. So it is just one of many points to consider for legitimacy.
  13. That’s interesting, John! I have never seen mon before with geometric shapes like this. Do you think they are stylized kanji or just geometric shapes?
  14. Connor, Don't be bothered by the fact that the signature is gimei. It was a well known practice as long as they were making swords. Samurai, as well as Shoguns, have been known to treasure a sword while knowing it was gimei. As for your fittings. This sword could have been brought to the war by it's owner, refitted with the wooden saya (scabbard) for the field. It would have been covered by a leather cover. They are often lost over the years. Many were donated, or bought up by the military in drives to meet demands of the war effort, then refitted in varying degrees and sold to new officers. Yours looks to have kept the civilian tsuka (handle). Cannot tell if the tsuba (hand guard) was kept or a military one put in its place. You can see an example of how it might have looked: They were also refitted fully with military hardware: There are ways to restore your sword and make it look nice, or you can keep it as is. Either way, please read up on how to take care of it: Japanese Sword Care - Japaneseswordindex.com
  15. The stamp was used by the civilian Seki Cutlery Manufacturers Association between 1940 and 1945. The massive majority of dated blades with the stamp were made ‘42.
  16. Justin, Can you show me a clear photograph of that small stamp above the signature? It will give us a date range.
  17. Nick, Other than the second ana, this one is a really good example of a standard WWII officer sword. The large Seki stamp puts the date between 1940 - 1945 with the most likely date of 1942.
  18. Anybody make out the Buddhist bonji? If so, and forgive me for opining as this is WAY out of my ballpark, but this doesn't look like faker work. At the least Edo/Meiji tourist piece. Never seen a faker carve in utsuri saya, and nakago looks too good for the fakers.
  19. Daniel, Do you know the background on this sword? The blade looks like it was made for a Rinji seishiki model (Type 3; Type 100; Type 44; etc) and the fittings would look like this: If you decide to keep it in that Type 98 saya, I'd at least try to find a Type 3 tsuka (handle) for it. It would be a mis-match, but I have seen many gunto like that over the years. I found the missing parts for my dad's Mantetsu, but it took me 2 or 3 years. You can find parts for sale on ebay and other aution houses (Proxidbid and Invaluable show sales from a variety of auction houses)
  20. Nice one posted by @BANGBANGSAN here: Made in the last month of the war, Aug '45, so pretty pristine:
  21. Chris, Safe to assume there is no date on the other side?
  22. It is a legit type 95. I wish they could all be rescued. If I had the money, I would do it, but if it is not your thing, like everyone said there are nice ones to be found out there. You’ll probably pay more money though.
  23. Looks real Nick. Where is it, an antique store or pawn shop? Just curious.
×
×
  • Create New...