Bruce Pennington

Thanks Ray! And John! So, not much known about him: "YOSHISADA (義定), Shōwa (昭和, 1926-1989), Gifu – “Yoshisada” (義定), real name Ishihara Jō´ichi (石原錠一)" Now I'll have to go through my files to see which one's I have, because the RJT Yoshisada was Yamamura Yoshisada from Kochi, and used different kanji. Thanks guys!

Yes, quite nice! James, you have a Type 97 Japanese Naval officer sword, or kiagunto. You can read up on them at Ohmura's great site: Naby Officers Sword - 1937 Some care and cleaning tips: Japanese Sword Care.

Hank, Can you try a mangnet to the habaki (the collar on the blade just south of the hand guard) and see if it's iron?

@Scogg - can you split this off to a new topic?

A beauty! And with silver plated tsuba.

@Ljm - Welcome! Newcomers often don't notice the NMB rule for using first names, so please go to your profile and tell us what "L" stands for, unless you actually go by "L", ha! We like to talk to real people. I have 19 Yoshisada blades on file and most of them are stamped with Showa or large Seki stamps. These blades tend to be very nice quality, but something in their making disqualifies them as "traditionally made." Yoshisada did become RJT qualified, but I only have one blade from him with the star stamp indicating it was made for the RJT program and therefore traditionally made. Edit: Thanks for the name, Liam! @SteveM @Ray Singer or others - could we get a full translation? There are a couple Yoshisada listed in Sesko's list and I'd like to pin one of them down for my records.

John, you're amazing! You've learned to read their cursive?! Cool. The photo is too blurry at top, but the stamp will be the Showa stamp, rather than Gifu. Blades inspected by the civil Seki Cutlery Manufacturers Association were all (almost all) signed katana mei, like this one. Blades with the arsenal stamps, including Gifu in sakura, were all signed tachin mei. SHOWA KATANA MEI TACHI MEI 1935 1 1937 1 1939 4 1940 21 1 1941 21 1942 1 ND 64 1 SEKI Large 1940 4 1941 7 1942 37 1943 19 1944 6 ND 109 1 SEKI small 1943 1 1944 1 Star 18 (8 Star) 1945 10 (2 Star) ND 1 NA 1941 1 1942 8 (1 Star) 1943 48 (2 Star) 1944 15 1945 1 ND 3 FUKU 1 GIFU 1944 1 1945 18 ND 1 SAKA 1943 2 1944 5 ND 7 Ko 1935 1 1942 3 (1 Star) 1944 1 (1 Star) ND 2 1 YAMA 1943 4 (1 Star) 1944 1

Good examples, Marcin! I wouldn't know how to determine if that last one was original or not. Akira Komiya at Warrelics likely could help with that.

Precisely. My chart of pre-RJT program blades with stamped numbers: 1941, Jul Munetoshi (pre-RJT) – Niigata 106 Slough, RS 1941 Akihisa (pre-RJT) – Niigata 188 “1” on fittings Michael67, NMB, T98RS 1941, Aug Tsugukiyo (pre-RJT) – Kagawa 232 Bangbangsan, RS 1941, Sep Akihisa (pre-RJT) – Niigata 249 Trotter Survey, no pics 1941, Sep Munetoshi (pre-RJT) – Niigata 308 Trotter Survey, no pics 1941, Oct Munetoshi (pre-RJT) – Niigata 392 Leen, NMB RS 1941, Nov Tomomaro (pre-RJT) – Nagano 470 Kotachi,NMB, RS 1941, Dec Akihisa (pre-RJT) – Niigata 566 Windy, NMB, RS 1941, Dec Tomomaro (pre-RJT) – Nagano 535 Tsuba, RS 1941, Dec Tomomaro (pre-RJT) – Nagano 621 Ray Singer website RS 1942, Jan Akihisa (pre-RJT) – Niigata 798 Kapp/Monson,pg76 RS 1942, Jan Tsugukiyo (pre-RJT) – Kagawa 762 Aucview.aucfan.com 1942, Feb Sukehiro (pre-RJT) – Tokyo 875 Btreed3.ebay, RS in T98 1942 Feb Sukehiro (pre-RJT) – Tokyo 876 Leen, NMB 1942, Mar Kanetsugu (pre-RJT) 898, Suya on tsuba JB Militaria, RS 1942, Mar Norisada (pre-RJT) – Fukuoka Na Ho “1” on mune Leen, NMB 1942, Apr Masakazu (pre-RJT) – Fukushima 1129; “1” on mune George Trotter, RS, tsuba/seppa ニ1129 1942, Apr Tenshozan Forging Workshop 1 nakago jiri Robinalexander, NMB 1942, May Kanetsugu (pre-RJT) – Gunma 1220 Kapp/Monson,pg76 RS 1942, May Norisada (pre-RJT) – Fukuoka Na Ho 3 on mune K.Elliott, NMB 1942, May Akihisa (pre-RJT) – Niigata 1229 JCmilitaria.com, RS 1942, May Akiyoshi, Fujita (RJT) – Yamagata 74 Crusader22, NMB, RS 1942, May Ryuu (pre-RJT) – Okoyama 1301 Striking 9th, W-A, RS 1942, Jun Kanenori (pre-RJT) – Gifu Na Ho 1 on mune 1942, Jul Naotsugu (pre-RJT) – Yamagata 61 Samuraishokai.jp T98

I haven't heard that one, either, Russ. You clearly heard it somewhere, though. Sounds like something someone would say to explain a poorly made blade found in good gunto fittings.

The sarute looks original to me. Not uncommon on late war gunto. The 'hammer' marks are where someone removed the sarute and hammered it back in. You have to bend them to get them off, then squeeze (I cover them with a cloth and squeeze with pliers) or hammer (not preferred) to get them back on and into shape.

Hi Miles, Your blade is in shirasaya, or resting/storage fittings. Did it come with military fittings as well? I am often wrong, but I believe this is your guy: "NOBUMITSU (信光), Shōwa (昭和, 1926-1989), Fukuoka – “Chikushū-jū Sa Nobumitsu kinsaku” (筑州住左信光 謹作, “carefully made by Sa Nobumitsu from Chikuzen province”), real name Koyama Nobumitsu (小山信光), he was born on the 26th day of the second month Meiji six (明治, 1873) and studied under Fukuoka-Ishidō Koretoshi (是利), he lived in Chikuzen´s Ito (怡土), kihin-jōi (Akihide), Special Honor Seat at the 6th Shinsaku Nihontō Denrankai (新作日本刀展覧会, 1941) (see picture right)" Chikushu was the old name of Fukuoka province in Kyushu.

Ah! I couldn't find a "omi" that was signed the same way, so I suspected I was wrong. Thanks Piers!

Nick, The sword is a Japanese officer Type 98. You can read up on those on Ohmura's site: Army Officer Shingunto - 1938 Care and cleaning: Japanese sword Care There are three Kanemitsu smiths that worked WWII in Sesko's list. A good clear photo of the signature might help ID which one. If you will take a couple good, clear close-ups of the blade body, showing hamon (temper line) and steel texture, we might be able to make a guess as to whether the blade was made traditionally or not. Values vary with what we find. Non-traditional bladed gunto sell anywhere from $900-1,400, depending upon where you sell and to whom. If the blade was traditionally made, the value can be higher.

Asking for someone on Gunboards:

Tried improving it a bit:

Thanks for sharing Paul's article. Lots of thoughts swirling, most already stated so far, and trying to solidify them in my head. While I recognize the significance Paul pointed out so well, I think I fall on the side of the fact that the "spoils of war" has always been, and always will be the norm. Agreed, as Paul pointed out, there have been recent examples of nations returning great treasures stolen during recent wars. But they are almost singular in the specific items. These swords are the opposite of that. Thousands of swords that can never be traced to their original family - how would they ever be repatriated? Dan's idea of sending them to temples might work, but they'd need a pretty big warehouse (which is not impossible) and the individual families would never feel true closure by such a mass deposit. Like the Germans, the Japanese people were wounded by their own leaders. And it's a wound that, while decades/centuries may heal, the scar will always remain.

Someone may correct me, but I'm not aware of any regs or documents that discuss this. We've seen a good number of them appear here at NMB. It is our assumption that they were made on private contract.

Hi David! The other guys have your sword ID'd pretty well already - late war, made in occupied areas of S.E. Asia for either Japanese officer or officer of collaboration forces. It is quite common to see them with solid wooden handles covered in leather, just like yours. Good eye, Marcin!!! You nailed it!

Ron, I would encourage you to continue. Post on NMB if you have any doubts about the next one.

Adding a cross-reference link to John's thread:

John, I have mistaken lacquered fabric, in the past, as leather. I think this one is one of those. See the fabric weave: We see the same effect in the RS (Type 3, etc) tsuka ito. Now, to your question - I don't know. There are examples out there, but I haven't tracked them. I feel like it was rare.

I have a Ko with no arsenal stamps. Interesting to hear the theory about a date when stamps were not used. @Kiipu - do your records indicate a timeframe where stamps were not used and then a point when they began using them on the Type 32?

It would be nice to know which of the fittings you had originally, and which were the new constructs, thanks. We have two other examples of that kabutogane (end cap on handle). One posted by @robinalexander on page 1 of this thread, and the other, on the same page by @PNSSHOGUN. John's Rob's

Was that your chogi oil and baking soda treatment?