Peter Bleed

Thanks Curran. This may develop slowly, but details will - potentially - follow. P

Friends, I am looking at what looks like a nice old tosho guard - sorry no pictures. It is, however, quite thin - like 2mm on the seppa-dai. Is that too thin - and a possible red flag? Peter

Indeed we have discussed this topic and I even posted a rather clumsy version of the paper that Ron mentions. It is somewhere in the recent NMB files. I LOVE the guard that was referred to above. Here are a couple of other "Japanised European guards" Peter

Well, gee! If I had this tsuba, I'd ask Grey about it because it really looks old. I'd also ask about the - ahhh - strange surface finish. Peter

I have no dogs in this fight, but if a guy was looking for a kikuchi yari, Daimyo-sama's little tanto seems like something worth a second look. It carries an old "white paper" that I assume means that somebody in 1967 thought it was intact and legit, and not retempered.. . The fullness of the hamon seems more - ahhh - suspicious than the remnant straight grain above the shinogi. Muromachi? If it is a kikuchi-yari it could be older than that. And who was making them after 1603? Peter

Okay, I usually come to the NMB to vent and spout. I love the Board "Bigly"! But this time I am coming to the community to beg help with an OLD sword lead. is there anybody on the Board who is in/around Washington D.C. who might be able to help me with some research a sword I bought in 1984 (or so).I had spent a week (on a Foundation's dime OMG) listening to totally worthless D.C. crap and was on my way home via the Old Chicago Sword Show. Since the foundation was paying for my trip to Chicago, I had responsibly attended all those awful meetings and only got to go to a shop that was just around the corner from where I had been staying near Dupot Circle.as I was on my way out of town.. I believe it was called TROCADERO. . When I finally got there they had just pulled a bunch of stuff out of Alice Roosevelt Longworth's home - - which I guess was just across the street. Yes, Teddy's daughter, of the "Imperial Cruise" Now, all these years later i would like to know if there might be somebody in the D.C. area who could help me research this matter. Does Trocadero still exists? Might there be somebody who could recall this matter? Who got all the rest of that stuff? Peter

I am skeptical and would look for a "modern" explanation. I can't see it functioning as a firearm and it looks like a modern design and manufacture. Could it be the cast iron end of a large lever or adjustment arm. That well formed "handle" looks modern to my eye. I'd show it to a railway or nautical engineer. Peter

The date looks like 2600th anniversary of the imperial founding -which would be 1940. And it seems to have been made as protective weapon for a a Mr. Matsuyama. The "penmanship" of the mei looks good. A VERY interesting nakago! Peter

Once again, I ponder how wonderful it would have been if early Japan had been introduced to writing by the Spanish instead of the the Chinese .In any case I apologize if I erred in rendering this title.It would not be a first for me. I will certainly defer to Piers. But to make this issue more complex, the full title on the title page says something like "An Introduction to Old Style Guns. . . OLD Japanese GUNS" In other words, the word "OLD" appears twice, BUT "Old Style" is pronounced "Koshiki" and, as we have just learned, "Old Guns" is uttered "Furuju." So I suppose this title would be KoshikiI Ju Nyumon Nihon No Furuju" or might it be "Koshiki Tsutsu..."? And I decided to call the author "Sawada" and didn't even take a stab at his first name. Are we sure he doesn't go by "Takuda" Growing up with the name "Peter Bleed" allows me to find othe' peoples' names remarkable

Der Friends, Thru the good offices of Grey Doffin I was able to get a nice new edition of Sawada's Koshikju Nyumon Nihon no Koju (Japanese Old Guns) and I am very pleased. This is not a gaijin friendly volume, but it very well presented with great illustrations.. As and "introduction" it emphasizes oddities, but it covered a wide range of both matchlock and 19th century firearms. It shows lots and lots of different19th century imports, Details of when and how imports were obtained seems pretty terse, but the range of imports must be fairly complete. Tables and lists are generally rather easily to approachable for folks with a bit of Japanese. I think this book deserves a spot in a collector's library. Peter

How embarrassing is this?!. Am I the last person to discover the books of Jan. E. Culbertson? At least I seem to have not been hanging out with the Chinese sword collecting crowd. Amazon and Google have informed me of the availability of these books, but at approximately $1.00 a page, I have to wonder if they are worth the investment. To put the finest point on this, are these volumes worth adding to a Japanese sword library? Peter

I rather like to have a sword with a bit of muneware since they help to explain the flaws that regularly occur in Masame. In gross term, the mune os the "masame side" of itame blades. Muneware, in other words help to understand masame. Peter

Thank you Hamfish and Bruce. Once again the NMB has worked, but I think we have also come up against the limits of our knowledge. I have no interest in thsi sword - well none beyond some curiosity about Manchuko and the hope that somebody on the Board might find it of interest. Given the recent appearance of Chinese swords that verge on fantasy or copies of historical types we do have to be careful in trying to sort our things like potential Manchurian or colonial Japanese weapons. I am pretty sure that this sword is authentic. The owner say it has been in his collection for at least 50 years. In general, I hope that "Chinese sword collecting" will open up. We need more publications on 20th Century - Nationalist.Manchukuoan/Etc swords. And we also truly and deeply need to have better reference studies of Continental sword fittings from the Ching dynasty.. Bruce, I appreciated the suggestions on the other lists. I have tried to access them.And I'll keep trying. BUT my expereince with them always make me impressed by how user friendly the NMB is. Go Brian! Go NMB Peter

Dear Friends, Once again i beg the help of the Board with a question. I recently noted a Japanese blade that has appeared on eBay, As an on-going auction i will do no more than to use it as a example. We will not discuss its quality or value, altho I will say that it certainly nice. http://www.ebay.com/itm/222427703330?_trksid=p2060353.m1431.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT I have seen these koshirae before and several time have had them pointed out to me as potential "AINU" blades. They are not uncommon and they seem to forrn a distinct type - plain wood saya/tsuka. antler fittings, and often tightly wound "rattan" wrap in the tsuka and/or the saya. They also rarely have what we might think of as "collectible" blades. As a collector of Ainu stuff, I am SURE (100%) that these are NOT Ainu gear. They have NEVER been shown in any books or catalogs on Ainu Material Culture and I have never seen them in Japanese exhibits of Ainu materials. The rattan wrap doesn't show up on any other Ainu stuff and they do NOT have any of the other classic features of Ainu art - 'bracket' design, 'fish-scale cross hatch' etc.. So what are these? They may be Matagi gear of some kind.- made for an by forest workers. And i suppose they could be gardeners' tools, altho they look way to rustic/crude to be polite bonsai tools. These things do NOT look like samurai weapons. If anyone has insights, I would love to hear them. Peter

I sure can't read it all, but it does indeed say that it was made by a resident of Sendai. Neat indeed! Peter

I managed to get a couple of more images of the sword I asked the Board about recently. I emphasize that this is "miltaria" rather than an arm and I can present only a couple more phone shots. I hope they will meet the basic needs of the community that might be interested in this piece. It "looks" like a Japanese sword in general terms. It has a habaki and a artifial yakiba. There is a same cover on the hilt which generally looks like the Japanese 1875/86 swords. But the thing is well below Japanese production standards. Note that it also carries a silk knot.. It also has a two digit stamped number - 88 - on both the drag and the hilt.There is NO history on where it was acquired but it has been in its current collection for "at least 40 years." I take that to mean that t it is NOT "recent" Chinese production. Peter

Well, Okay, Hamfish. I'll try to get some better images. Peter

A friend showed me a sword this weekend that I hope will be of interest to some on the NMB.. It is a blade that rather looks like a Japanese parade sword. It has a habaki and a kesho hamon, BUT it is generally cruder than comparable Japanese swords. It also has what I read as a Plum blossom in a sprigs of grass on the back strap. I suppose that it may be Manchukoan, but I do not see a comparable koshirae in Dawson's book - - and I note that he says that " Plum Blossoms" are common on Chinese swords. Any expert reactions? Peter PS. Yes Yes, I see that my image is slight out of focus. Please be assured that this thing didn' look very good in real life! Oh, and that gunto laying on the table in the background was a vert ordinary Seki blade. And a week ago I was in Tampa! P

Indeed, THANKS! I was very pleased to see this! peter

There is little to add to what Arnold has already said. but I have to agree that the Tampa event was a success. It certainly was a bit smaller than past shows. And there were smaller piles of swords. The presence of two (count'em 2) Japanese television crews added a bit of glamor to the event. It also suggests that swords remain of popular interest in Japan. The range of swords for sale was very large, but it seemed that there were buyers for everything. Stuff was changing hands. It as also great fun to see lots of old friends. I brought home two Sendai Shinto. The first was a recently polished mumei blade in shin-gunto mounts. It has nice masame-hada, but it had not passed shinsa . . . when it had a now erased Kunikane signature. This sword was pointed out to me by Chris Leung who recalled my interest in the Kunikane group. The other is a very short katana signed "Nagashige." This blade is a bit of a puzzle. I have never seen another sword from this line and niji-mei signatures seem rather rare. These smiths seem not to have had connection with the Kunikane groups so I am not sure how to look at it. I am low on the learning curve on this one. Weather in the northeast was not the only challenge to the event. My trip home involved one cancelled flight that had had problems in Mexico! Peter

It has been two months since we moved into "retirement" and a new home so that this thread has been of great interest to me.So far I really have made NO progress on getting my Japanese swords out, but I am not sure how to present that stuff. As a collector (and an an archaeologist) I have always preferred "discovery". I also tend to prefer looking at Japanese stuff in hand. Very few "behind glass" presentations really work for me. Both blades and fittings require and deserve close inspection. And they tend not to do well in the open air.. Looking at the presentations here have given me some inspirations, but I'm still not at all sure that I want to "display" Japanese arms. By way of contrast, please let me attach a snap shot of some of my "other stuff" Compared to Japanese arms, European arms are rather easily stored in a way that makes it easy to inspect, handle, and clean. For me, the key to collecting is comparison between types and categories. Putting them cleaning on a wall also seems like a reasonable way of managing them. I had kind of thought about shedding my European swords since I really don't view them as "my" collection, but getting them out and figuring out how to show them as been fun - - and easy. Now I have to deal with the Nippon-to! Peter

hope it was a garage sale price. Peter

In llight of the recent discussion of small hinawaju, there might be interest in this page scanned from the 1907 Francis Bannerman catalog. I love old catalogs, and Bannerman's is always good. But this one is a reprint so it is not very sharp. Still, it is interesting to see what Banner had to offer. I am not sure when this merchandise initially appeared, but some pieces appear to have been sold by 1907. I have none of the WWI era catalogs, but this page had been abandoned by the mid 1930s so this stuff seems to have found homes. In addition to this full page sale, he only had a couple of other Japanese matchlocks and they are very generally treated. He also did not have much in Japanese swords, either. It is almost as if there was special and specific interest in these little bangers Peter

Neither of these swords would be - - ahhh, what I'd think of as text book examples of Naminohira. Am i expecting too much ayasugi hada? Peter

No, Alex, it was NOT aimed at you. I was snapping about earlier posts that told me that Tokubetsu Hozon is OK and not to be lamented. Obviously, a sword judged "Especially Worthy of Preservation" deserves a place in a sword collector's holding. How could a serious sword collector "hate" to own such a sword? I was being ironic - or at last trying to be. In any case, I should not have snapped. I saw your comments as in line with mine. I apologize to you and the Board. BUT SINCE WE'RE HERE... Please let me explore a bit farther about how standardization has changed sword collecting. My basic feeling is that until recently individual sword collectors had to and could make up their own minds about what they liked and what they considered worthy of collecting.Making those decision used to be FUN and Informative and very individual. There is still a great deal of individual freedom and choice, but as sword collecting has developed the categories of what is "really desirable" have changed. In general, there has been a growth in interest in rather early koto blades. At the same time, it sure looks to me like interest in particular lines and regional schools has ebbed. Parallel to that, it sure seems that interest in Shinto blades has rather fallen off. There is less interest in getting another... . Tadayoshi, Ujifusa, Kinmichi, Masanori ... or whatever (please notice that I did NOT mention Kunikane). That kind of collecting has probably gotten harder and more expensive than it used to be. But I think the MAIN reason for the change is that modern collecting has given up those kinds of categories and replaced them with categories of VALUE and "IMPORTANCE". Instead, of aiming AT WHAT THEY HAVE DECIDED IS WORTHY. lots of collectors seem to be proud of assembling stuff that experts have come to judge worthy. With organization, individual judgement has been replaced by authority..It also may be that "Important' categories have become inflated. In understanding that at the last Token Daiichi there were lots of mere Juyo blades that went unsold because serious players wanted JUBI, or maybe even JUBU. Along with all of that there has been the well documented blossoming of interest in Gendai-to and gunto . Literature and expertise in that area has blossomed, but it has also been an area that individual collectors can access, explore, and use. It also happens to be an area that has not been completely dominated by Japanese authorities. Import restrictions and other historical reasons have allowed foreign collectors some special advantages in these areas. The price of some of these items strikes me as right up there with Holland bulbs, but I sincerely respect the collector interest that informs this collecting area. I especially wish that I'd been more attentive to things like copper handles NCO swords OMG! I like thinking about swords and I deeply appreciate the NMB. Thank you all for allowing me to express myself. Peter