Hi Guys
Some time back I sold an Emura to another Aussie. The sword had a slight bend and the polish I would say is good to very good (hamon and hada clearly visible). The guy I sold it to (let's just call him Jack) seemed to have basic knowledge of Nihonto but nothing extensive.
Then a while after receiving the sword from me, Jack emailed me telling me that the sword had been given to another man in Australia who was going to straighten the sword and submit it to the March '09 NTHK Shinsa in Sydney on his behalf. He said that after the man checked out the sword he concluded the sword was a gimei Emura, and was in fact a Shinto era sword! I wrote back telling him that this was clearly not the case, and that he should not trust the sword to be straightened to someone who could make such a wrong and amateur mistake like that. I should point out that Jack was not after a return/refund and not after any compensation; he was just telling me these things.
Anyway, I didn't hear back from him until recently when he emailed me again telling me that the NTHK had pink slipped the Emura and wrote on the pink slip that that the Emura is gimei and the sword is a Shinto era blade!! I of course asked to see a copy of the pink slip which Jack is mailing to me, but how could the NTHK make such a mistake? I suspect fowl play on behalf of the man who submitted the sword on his behalf. For some reason Jack refuses to tell me who this agent is, but he also told me got the sword back straightened, and told me the man also "cleaned [the sword] a bit".
I would like to get to the bottom of this, and just so "Jack" can see this thread I hope that others can look at the photos at the following link and confirm that the sword is indeed a genuine Emura, and not a Shinto era blade. I mean, you can see through the rust on the nakago fresh yasurimei and near the top of the nakago you can see perfect fresh silver yasurimei without any rust at all!
Any other comments are welcome.
http://s209.photobucket.com/albums/bb13 ... i%20Emura/