Jump to content

Boywhocouldfly

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Boywhocouldfly's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Thanks for the info. Can anyone read the character under the anchor? Any idea what it means? Also, the end may not be square as it does appear to be broken (or at least not straight)
  2. Wow, thanks Matt, good to know. Why would you say the Hamon is artificial? Obviously it's not in great shape but can you estimate the value of this piece?
  3. Hello, I have a sword that I'm trying to identify. It has very few markings. I have had it for about 30 years but don't know anything about it before that. I'll post some photos. here's what I do know; - the blade has an obvious hamon - the only stamp on the tang is an "anchor" - below the anchor is a very faded character that I have tried to photograph. it is obviously not stamped but written - the Habaki does not have a "notch" like most of the authentic ones I've seen. it also appears to be a different type of metal as it is not rusty, possibly silver - the habaki as a few lines/marks on one end that look like they were put there on purpose - the top plate attached to the part with the floral print (Fuchi I think it's called) has two English numbers stamped in it, an "8" and a "5". I have seen other authentic swords with English numbers stamped here -besides the blade itself I have 4 other parts that I believe are original to this knife. the biggest part (Tsuba I think) is very heavy and rusty, possibly iron. Can anyone help? Any ideas? Please let me know. Thanks so much, Andrew
×
×
  • Create New...