
wdjensen123
Members-
Posts
31 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by wdjensen123
-
In the second set of photos, 8.jpg, there is a 5 petalled brass flower. What is it for? I see a lot more of them on Japanese matchlocks on the net. Another way I can have grounds for returning the childs matchlock is to complain that the serpentine hammer does not mate up with the pan, I was assured it does. Anyone else think it looks to be malaligned? Sincerely, Bill Jensen
-
Here is a Japanese matchlock pistol in a museum (Penn State) that claims to have an almost straight butt. But no picture I am afraid: http://www.penn.museum/collections/object/318742 Sounds like mine. It says"Japanese matchlock hand cannon or pistol. Small, wood, pistol with metal bore and matchlock firing mechanism. Almost straight-butt end does not curve much at all. The outside edges of the muzzle are carved out in an octagonal shape."
-
I have noticed a major difference from the links to authentic Japanese pistols to mine. The serpentine hammers have a very short left side (might be because these examples have internal mainsprings) and angular bend, and my serpentine is a graceful gentle curve on both sides. Also the right side of the Japanese authentic ones are angularly sloped, with a close large head for the match to attach to, where mine doesn't seem to have anything like that at all. Are my observations correct? What do you make of these details? Are Rifles serpentines anything more like mine, especially the ones with external springs? Sincerely, Bill Jensen
-
Any ideas about the powder flasks that come with my matchlock? Do they look Japanese? I saw a few examples of Japanese powder flasks up for sale on Ebay in the $300 range. Do you think I might sell them for as much as that, incomplete as one of them is? I might be able to recoup some of my money if I decide I must keep it. Sincerely, Bill Jensen
-
I have bought very few guns, mostly ones that seem unusual. This is my first matchlock, and I got it because it looked so different from others I have seen on the web, and I wanted to learn all about it, where it was made, by who, and dating, etc. That's what piques my interest. And I like to find early examples of things, and it is my suspect that this gun is far older than a date of 1800, what do you think? Sincerely, Bill Jensen
-
Do you guys think my childs matchlock is made in Japan, or a cheap India or other matchlock? Someone seems to think so. I express mailed my payment today, and paid for express shipment of the matchlock to me in return. So I will know in 2 days if there is a signature under the barrel. Sincerely, Bill Jensen
-
Payment has been sent already. And I am good on my word to pay for it. The only reason I would return it is if the iron pan is drilled through, and they said it was not, a return based on false information. Possibly a return based on the understanding it was supposed to be a childs gun, and of imperial use. I may be able to return it on that account. In any case, I want to remove the barrel to see if it has some good signature and information on it. I will post pictures once this is done. What's wrong with the wood? I assumed it was rippled because of shrinkage and great age. Sincerely, Bill Jensen
-
I saw this on the web: "While the Japanese were technically able to produce tempered steel (e.g. sword blades), they preferred to use work-hardened brass springs in their matchlocks" so its not out of the realm of possibility that an old matchlock Could have had a iron / steel spring. From the amount of blackening on it, it appears to be an original part of the gun, and not a later addition. I just have never seen an iron spring before. I may consider returning it, especially if the pan is drilled out, and they were wrong in describing it to me. Otherwise I guess it will be a learning experience. Sincerely, Bill Jensen
-
Is part of its crude ugliness the 5 barrel bands, or are there other features that make it ugly and a sows-ear? If the barrel is signed, does that mean that the named matchlock maker made the wood and brass parts as well, or did they only make the barrels alone, and had someone else do the wood and brass parts? Sinceerely, Bill Jensen
-
Is part of its crude ugliness the 5 barrel bands, or are there other features that make it ugly and a sows-ear? If the barrel is signed, does that mean that the named matchlock maker made the wood and brass parts as well, or did they only make the barrels alone, and had someone else do the wood and brass parts? Sinceerely, Bill Jensen