rodrig4

sukemitsu Hello. could you give me your opinion on this wakisashi. more precisely on its historical value. thank you . sukemitsu kani no te (蟹 の 手) - Lit. "Crab needles" Special interpretation of gunome-midare with split yakigashira that protrude alternately left and right and reminiscent of crab claws. Please note that the term kani no te is used to refer to this feature when viewed on Sue-Seki blades. In the case of Sue-Bizen's works, the term kani no tsume (aws の lit, lit. "crab claws") is established even if the same characteristic is described. Weight: 826 grs Lg total; 87 cm Naked blade: 476 grs Lg 67 cm Cutting edge: 54 cm Moto kasane: 6mm Khaki kaki: 4.4mm Motorcycle haba: 28.5mm Saki haba: 18.3mm Mune: iori mune Sori: 9mm Kissaki: chu kissaki Nakagogiri: kengyo Yasurime: katte sagari Hamon: kani no te (蟹 の 手) Hada; itame hada Mekugi ana: 2 Tsuba from the EDO period. The mount is from the EDO period. cordially. RODRIGUEZ.

Good evening I can not translate these kanjis. could you help me. thank you. Rodriguez

Hello do you know this swordmith 佐 源 Yamada Sagen 美濃 伝 Mino School in 1943. cordially. RG.

I understand that this wakisashi is from the tegai school. But according to the few photos at my disposal I can not determine the kantei of this blade. rodriguez

Hello. I am interested in this wakisashi, and I need advice. thank you. Rodriguez.

OK. thank you for the info. have a good day. Rodriguez.

ok. merci pour l'info. bonne journée. Rodriguez.

Hello. Could you give me the translation of that signature. Cordially. RG.

Hello. Could you give me the translation of that signature. Cordially. RG.

Hello. It is difficult for me to translate the signature of this tsuba. Could you help me. Cordially. Rodriguez.

I attached some pictures of the blade. Rodriguez.

Hello. Mei is "Washu ju Tomomitsu" 和州 住友 光, but I can not translate other kanji. In places the mune is round? The common mune by place is not Ioro-mune? Is it a bad polishing? Could you help me. Rodriguez. PS: I would insist on signatures for duplex it is likely that these are not the same smiths who signed signatures as its completely different. But still I would like to understand the three kanji that I can not translate. Thank you in advance.

Here after cleaning tsuba. I fail not to translate the kanji on the fushi. rodriguez.

Hello. tsuba is apparently signed Mitsuhiro. I can not translate the other part of this tsuba, a little help would be welcome. cordially. rodriguez.

Hello. Could you give me an opinion on this wakisashi which is unfortunately in poor condition. the shape of the blade makes me think has the momoyama period. The tsuba is signed but I can not decipher. The Stuka is interesting. With Seppa there was a Seppa paper? I thank you in advance. Rodriguez.

Hello. I was puzzled when this signature, and I wonder if there is a gimei or original signature. here are some photos of the hada and hamon and I would like to know what you think. cordially. rodriguez.

Hello. I am somewhat skeptical when was signing my last aquisition. could you tell me if there is a gimei or original. cordially. Rodriguez.

Hello. I need advice on this blade. thank you in advance. cordially. rodriguez. 日本刀　刀　会藩臣下坂重三郎長直（会津藩砲兵隊一番隊士） 　　　　　　慶応二丙寅年八月日 Council clan Japanese Sword vassal Shige Saburo Sakai ChoTadashi (Aizu clan more artillery officer of the body) Keio Nihei Tiger years in August Date katana [aizu_shin shimosaka shigesaburou naganao KEIO 2] (Aizu feudal clan artillery First Squad) day guarantee preservation sword swords NBTHK Hozon Number: 1610-1037 Saber entering Koshirae Blade length Blade length (HA-CHOU) 66.8cm (two two little feet cun more than a minute) curvature chain (Sori) 1.8cm original width Width hamachi (MOTO-HABA) 3.02cm Motoshige Thickness at Moto Kasane 0.69cm 鎬 重 0.76cm previous width 1.89cm Sakikasane 0.51cm Raw lovely idol rod Country (KUNI) · era Period (Jidai) Mutsu Aizu country late Edo period in 1866 (1866) Mutsu Aizu. The Edo period last KEIO 2 (1866) Kanagawa registration No. 55105 November 6, 1973 Nippon Foundation certificate Art swords save backup Association swords certificate August 17, 2015 [Comment] Ishido referred TameYasushi teenager. Like most of the officer corps of the Aizu clan artillery was active.

Hello. That is the question I ask myself, as this slide is meant to be the period: Momoyama Period papered Tachi Koshirae Nagasa w: 67.7 cm - 26.65 inch. Would it be possible to have a more informed opinion, because the metal blade that leaves me skeptical. Best regards. Rodriguez.

Hello. I'm confused to decipher the signatures and I need help. Best regards . rodriguez.

Hello. Could you give me your opinion on this naginata. Signed対馬守 藤原 貞重 Tsushima-no-kami Fujiwara Sadashige, who is the famous swordsmith in Bishu (Now, Aichi Prefecture) . Sadashige’s real name is鈴木市左衛門　　Suzuki Ichizaemon Sadashige learned the skill from貞幸Sadayuki and made lots of great quality of swords and Naginatas around寛文頃Kanbun era 1661~1672. Hamon of this Naginata is Nie-deki and Gonome-midare with Suguha. This blade must get influence from Soshu-den and has beautiful Hamon. There is beautiful Naginata-hi (Koshi-hi) carving. There is Hamon even at Mune area. Judging from Nakago, this blade is not thinner because of polishing, therefore this blade is beautiful appearance. Recent polishing. <Blade> Hacho(Blade length): 44.1cm Sori (Curvature): 1.6cm Motomihaba (Width at the Hamachi):3.09cm Motokasane(Thickness of Motokasane): 8.1mm Sakimihaba: 3.12cm Sakikasane: 5.9mm Nakago (The tang of the blade) Length: 34.6cm Material: Iron Hamon: Nie-deki and Gonome-midare with Suguha Jihada: Ko-mokume-hada Mune: Mitsumune # of Mekugi-ana(the hole for the mekugi): 1 Signature: 対馬守 藤原 貞重 Tsushima-no-kami Fujiwara-Sadashige Weight (Approx.): 575g –Blade only high quality one, influenced by Soshu-den. Best regards. Rodriguez

good aftenoon. Katana in koshirae. Signed: "Bishu Osafune Tadamitsu 備州長船忠光" and dated "The 8th month of 1481 (文明十三年八月日)." I can hardly read the mei and the date due to corrosion, but this is what the registration certificate says. could you give me an opinion on this blade. thank you. rodriguez.

Hello. I forgot to mention that the common is Matsuba-saki. The form of the naginata led to think that this seems like a ceremonial element. do the ceremonial forge has these features? Best regards. Rodriguez.

Bonjour. Je oublié de mentionner que la commune est Matsuba-saki. La forme de la naginata conduit à penser que cela semble être un élément d'apparat. Ont été établis avec ces caractéristiques? Cordialement. Rodriguez.

Hello. I failed to mention that mune is Matsuba-saki. The form of the naginata leads to think that it seems to be a ceremonial element. Were they with forged with these characteristics? Best regards. Rodriguez.