Whilst fighting the latest bout of man-flu, i just happened to pick up "facts and fundamentals". A paragraph in the book (pictured below) amused me. I must say, i am in favour of papers backing up the legitimacy of a sword, but as Nobuo Nakahara stated in his book (some time ago), are folk dealing on papers?.
I read not so long ago that one member, whilst looking at a sword collection, did not see any merit in a Juyo blade, which at the time, did get me curious. I can understand why a sword may warrant higher papers, either because of smith/rarity/workmanship or historical importance, but heres the question (naive maybe). What differences/activities would you see in a $15000 Juyo blade that could not be found in say a $4000 blade? (or cheaper). Are there Juyo blades that simply do not deserve the title or the price tags?. A case of just needing to ask.
Ranking systems and price tags have a long tradition.