Steve Waszak

In Kokubo Kenichi's "Ten Rules of Tsuba Collecting" (1972), he states the following: "Iron tsuba differ from other iron craft products in the sense that iron tsuba can be played with in one's hands. Even a rusty iron tsuba that defies the scrutiny of our eyes may have the right tactile qualities. Thus, revealing its potential. The touch and weight of a guard in one's hand is important in the appreciation and evaluation process. When making a tsuba, it is difficult to reach a good balance between the niku and the mimi. Therefore, if a tsuba feels good in one's hand, it usually is a good one (the balance of the thickness of the tsuba's center vs. the thickness of the mimi and the overall shape of the tsuba all play an important role here). Therefore, when enjoying an iron tsuba, we need to see with our hands as well as our eyes." I can personally attest to the value of being able to feel the texture of a steel tsuba, and so would agree with Kokubo's thoughts here... Steve

Michael, I am quite certain that Ford is well aware of Christian history in Japan. I think Ford's point had to do with the hopelessly sloppy critical thinking employed by some theorists/scholars in reaching the conclusions they do regarding the presence of Christian iconography in tsuba design. While there are some tsuba from the latter 16th century I am quite confident employ such iconography, far too many guards from this or later eras are interpreted to do so. Just as a quick example, I have a piece on the sales page currently (an Owari guard) which features a big, bold "cross" as its dominant design element/motif. Is this, then, a Christian tsuba? No, it isn't. I think what Ford is saying is that much too often, highly dubious conclusions are drawn, using even more dubious critical inquiry. Needless to say, I would agree. Cheers, Steve

I have heard conflicting viewpoints on this, but in general, I agree with Guido. The one qualifier I would add, though, is that apparently, some individuals are burdened with a more "acidic" body chemistry, such that when they handle iron, there is higher likelihood of the inducing of rust formation. I can't say whether this is a "true fact," but probably the metal craftsmen here will know better than I... I can say that I do handle my steel guards without gloves, and haven't noticed any ill effects. Cheers, Steve

Payment made. Thanks, Markus! Cheers, Steve

Hi Bruno, No problem. Just to clarify, too, when I say the shape is not correct for the Yamakichibei smiths of the Momoyama years, I mean that the sort of tall, stiff mokko shape seen for the tsuba in your photos is not seen in those early works. Their mokkogata pieces have far more "life" to the shaping of the guard. Cheers, Steve

Hi Bruno, You are probably right: this is a late Edo copy of or "homage" to Yamakichibei (specifically, to the nidai, who was a smith in the Yamakichibei atelier in the Momoyama and very early Edo Periods). The other possibility is that this is a post-Edo Period piece. It is certainly no earlier than 19th-century. The rectangular hitsu-ana are not kantei points for the authentic Yamakichibei smiths: I can't recall seeing any genuine works with such hitsu-ana. As for the motif, this is one associated with two of the smiths of this atelier---the nidai and one other tsubako (see attached photo for example of his work). I don't know that I have seen any explanation/identification of this motif that is confident or certain of what it is. I have seen it described as a katakana "e" character, but I am a bit skeptical of this. As to the mei, since this is a piece having been made at least 200 years after the end of the actual Yamakichibei workshop, the signature of course cannot be "legitimate," if by this term you mean to reference one of the authentic tsubako of that workshop. There are many other indicators in this tsuba that show it to be a very late copy/homage: the steel is nothing like actual Yamakichibei metal. The shape is not one used by the 16th/17th-century smiths. The rim is perfunctory and ho-hum (nidai Yamakichibei rims are sublimely excellent). The "amida-yasuri" are amateurish (compare to authentic nidai amida-yasuri in the photo below). Hope this helps... Cheers, Steve

I'll definitely want the hard copy, too. Markus, do you have any other translations of publications on major tsubako planned? Cheers, Steve

I'll definitely want the color print copy, myself. Agreed: $125 for a quality 250-page work focused on one of the greatest names in tsuba history is a bargain. Speaking of bargains, if you can find a "real deal" Nobuiye for anything in the four figures, please let me know right away! They routinely go for five figures in my experience, and not always the low five figures. Cheers, Steve

I'm in for sure.

Another nidai Yamakichibei. Otafuku-mokkogata. Tsuchime. Uchikaeshi mimi. Momoyama Period. Ex-Lundgren collection.

Ed, I don't want to hijack the thread with this sub-thread, but yeah, your home defense will get it done, too, that's for sure. One comfort about having a small pack of huge dogs roaming the grounds is that i don't have to be home. They see and hear everything.

Ed, I definitely hear what you're saying. Having a few of these on the property helps with my peace of mind.

Ahhh... Thanks, Ed. Some great pieces there.

Man, where is all the steel? Time to right the ship a bit. A pair of nidai Yamakichibei tsuba:

Steel tsuba. 8.9cm. Uchikaeshi mimi. Otafuku-mokkogata. Owari Province. Momoyama Period. Interesting tsuba: though it has both NTHK papers and a shumei to Sadahiro (referring, I believe, to Owari Sadahiro, Keicho era, Momoyama Period), there is, on the left side of the seppa-dai on the omote, the remnant mei of the nidai Nobuiye. It has been abraded significantly, to the point that, in most light and in most angles of light, it is gone. But in the right light, at the right angle, the characteristics strokes forming the "Futoji-mei" Nobuiye (nidai) signature can be seen. It is, unfortunately, extremely difficult to capture this "ghost mei" in photos.

Yamakichibei. Shodai. Steel. Owari Province. Momoyama Period.

Okay. Thanks, Jim.

Would this by any chance include the Akao group? I'm thinking probably not, but...

Axel, Haki is a Japanese term I have seen translated as "power," or "unbridled spirit." It is used (among other applications, I imagine) to describe works that are particularly expressive in terms of boldness. Early (pre-Edo) Owari tsuba, more than most, possess great haki. They are often large, with heavy, wide rims and sukashi walls, restrained tekkotsu, and bold, direct, symmetrical designs, exuding potent martial confidence. They are usually not "poetic" in the way Kyo-sukashi and Akasaka tsuba can be (often to the point of mawkishness, I think, but that's just me). Their forging and steel quality in general is said to be very high. Sasano called Owari sukashi tsuba the ultimate when it comes to guards expressing martial power and spirit in the eyes of the bushi of the time. And it is true, too, in my experience, that when one sees a great Owari tsuba from this period and of this size---in person---the effect is memorable in a way few other tsuba can match. For lack of a better term, they "pop" with boldness, making other tsuba around them lifeless and dull by comparison. Again, this effect may be hard to experience just from photos. I would guess that the tsuba in question possesses significant haki, and that, in person, it dominates the space around it. Personally, I find the piece to be a bit too busy (I prefer a sparer design), but yeah, old, large, haki-infused Owari guards in great condition (terrific patina) can command such prices. They are rather rare. Cheers, Steve

Thanks for the heads-up on this, Pete. Some very nice pieces there for sure. Looks like your fave is already spoken for? Cheers, Steve

Hi Ron, You're in luck: Grey has a copy currently. I have this book. Many oshigata of great Nobuiye Tsuba. Cheers, Steve

Hi Curran, I believe John is referring to the group of tsuba recovered from the shipwreck of the Spanish vessel, the San Diego, which went down in the middle of the Momoyama Period, around 1600 if I recall correctly... Cheers, Steve

I find two or three mastiffs to be a remarkably effective deterrent to thieves. My dogs, plus a fire-resistant safe, is about all I need... Cheers, Steve

Hi Ed, Many thanks for posting these... All are very appealing. To my eye, and from having studied Momoyama era Oribe ware a bit, the two kogo appear most likely to be period. The chaire is a mayyybe, while the others look revivalist (i.e. 19th-century) or later. The publication, Turning Point: Oribe and the Arts of Sixteenth Century Japan Met Publications, 2003) is an invaluable book for those interested in Momoyama Period pottery, especially that connected with Tea, and even more so as concerns Furuta Oribe and the ware(s) that he is so intimately associated with. In particular, there is a valuable set of images---some of Momoyama era kuro-Oribe pieces, and then of 19th-century revivalist pieces---for comparison purposes. Highly recommended. Cheers, Steve

Pete's idea is the way to go. I certainly would be interested in contributing to a translation project for Markus on this book. The problem with having a Japanese person read it for you, Grev, is that unless this person has some good knowledge of the terminology/concepts attached to tsuba study, he or she may have some difficulty in communicating that terminology/those concepts with precision and clarity. Cheers, Steve