Jump to content

Luc T

Members
  • Posts

    534
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Luc T

  1. the most frustrating part for me was that there were some interesting pieces that must have been signed, but not a word of explanation nor notion of the mei. One helmet, probably a Nobuie, was appartenly dated 152(1?), but no name on the display... about the helmets, there was a momonari kabuto with butterfly maedate that is magnifficent. (Sakura museum)
  2. Yes, there was a splendid oyoroi, dated 14 th century. This was an edo high end copy, or less likely a late muromachi armor What we see on this picture is a Joshu koboshi kabuto, made around 1570, not early 1300.
  3. Certainly not! A Joshu (or Soshu) koboshi kabuto dates from the late 1500, not the early 1300. This is elementary knowledge.
  4. here a nice preview of their ‘expertise’
  5. Luc T

    Opinions on yoroi

    Partially edo and modern?
  6. I visited the ‘show’ today. i am shocked about the many wrong datings… elementary knowledge is absent, and this for such an institution. if you visit the expo, which I recommend, let the items speak for themselves, and forget the text on the labels.
  7. Hi Gary, this is a set made in West Japan. I think this counts for all the pieces of the armor. the Kabuto has a slight akoda shape. Better pictures would be good, this can also be Sagami work. the menpo is rather the so called nara-style (from what I see) the dou, nuinobe, is also rather Nanto style. the lacing, nice detail here, is als rather West Japanese.
  8. Hi Alain, Apart from the patina, what I see is a Myochin edo hanbo. Chin, Yadome..
  9. Luc T

    Katchū N°8

    On the road from Santa!
  10. Luc T

    Won an auction

    According the mei and nengo, this is a first generation Nobuie. Nobuie 1 started in 1504 (the first known nengo). Nobuie 2 started in 1532. An elegant helmet. It would be good to see the different angles.
  11. Luc T

    Katchū N°8

    And yes, N°9 is almost printed! this will be a top edition!
  12. Ienari, my first Saotome was one! Splendid smith.
  13. This depends on many many things
  14. Both are fine kabuto. What do you want to restore?
  15. The last pic is a koboshi Iechika. Iechika: 1630~1730. Indeed several generations, but no further info is available since the Saotome records are destroyed in a fire
  16. The signature is good. There are no Saotome earlier than edo.
  17. This looks like a very good Ietada, tho other one is a Ienari I suppose?
  18. The menpo of Uwe’s picture is added later to this armor.
  19. Hard to say… it looks young. Late edo, showa, gendai.who is going to tell us?
  20. Hi Gary, the shape is in the direction of the Ichiguchi, but I miss some important features to be convinced. Onthe other hand I see a lot of Gitsu influence, even the 72 plates, the shiten no byo, the mabezashi and haraidate. nice find!
  21. Yes, this is the work from East (or North) Japan, Tohoku region.
  22. Hello Meghan, this is a Saotome Ietada shiinari kabuto. I am almost sure it is signed at the rear plate inside the kabuto. The tehen no kanamono seems to be added later. nice mid edo kabuto.
  23. Hi Piers, about the lecture, I leave the comments to the audience. I hope they enjoyed it!
  24. It was a very nice edition, maybe the best till now! I met a lot of new JAS-members, and it was an honour to give a lecture for you all.
×
×
  • Create New...