ROKUJURO

Robert, this is an interesting one, and not the 'standard' design! Nice!

Josh, in case this blade is longer than 30.3 cm, it is a KO-WAKIZASHI in SHINOGI-ZUKURI form. Restoring such a blade requires knowledge; it is not so important to polish it until it is bright but to restore the shape and the lines in the first place. For that you have to know what you have! Don't try restoration at home, it will cause more damage than good. Keep it dry and oil it very lightly from time to time so that no oil gets into the SHIRA-SAYA. Don't clean the NAKAGO other than with a dry cloth.

Gordon, I can't really read Japanese but I don't see HIZEN TADAYOSHI on the paper. The other one is for the NAGAMORI. If I may give you an advice: Don't buy anything until you have aquired the knowledge to tell what is fake and what is genuine.

Following the description, it is a KOTO NAGINATA from the EDO period.....

Seems really interesting although chrome plating is not exactly the same as chromium oxide on the blade's surface. I can imagine that some natural electro-chemical process may have taken place.

Soflabrian, a photo would make it easier to help. And please be so kind to sign all posts with a real first name plus an initial as is the rule here.

Province is Toshû.

A standard shape in Southeast Asia. Look for 'Parang' in the internet, you will find many similar shapes especially for hacking knives.

Matt, you are probably right: some of the KANJI seem to be written in seal script. The way the chisel is used may vary; in this case I do not see any strange technique. The upper part of the MEI above the upper MEKUGI-ANA seems very faint or heavily corroded. I would like to suggest showing the blade to an expert. And if you don't mind showing the rest of the blade in detail as well; we are always curious to see and to learn......

Chris, you have a PM.

Jeremy, you should absolutely refrain from that! The TSUKA is old and cracked, and even if it was a cheap military item, you may not want to have it flying around in your rooms! In that condition, it is nothing to impress friends and the mounting is just good enough for a firm rest on a KATANA KAKE!

Most of these say HAMAMONO to me. The 'patina problems' seem to be a fine layer of lacquer chipping off. It may be a matter of taste, but I find none of these exciting. This depends of course on what you want to collect.

James, what is it that you are attracted by? I seem to see a blade with some corrosion on the edge, coming out of an obviously dirty SAYA, a polish that does not show a lot (maybe it's the photos), and a very, very simple TSUBA. HABAKI is o.k. I think. Signature is CHIKUZEN KUNI no JU KANE XX (KIYO or HARU?). I have no sword books to look it up.

The name is perhaps starting with HARU? The reading/pronunciation may be different as I could not find any TSUBASHI with name HARUJU....

Nightryder, please be so kind to sign all posts at least with your first name plus an initial. The NAKAGO seems to be from a WW II blade. I can see an arsenal stamp which is a hint to a mass produced blade. The second KANJI of the MEI is HIDE. It does not necessarily mean that a certain smith made this blade. The second photo is upside down.

Mike, that is a link to KANETOMO, not KANEMOTO. Easy to get confused!

Mike, to an extent, the history of your blade remains in the dark without a polish, and its possible beauty is hidden to your eyes. A 'window' is not done to look nice; it helps to decide whether or not a full polish could be worthwhile, and sometimes it is even possible to guess a school. Polish or not polish, that is the question - a difficult decision!.

Mike, there are a number of KOTO MINO smiths of that name . One of these may be your KANETOMO: (Swordmiths database in the NMB research) Kanetomo Koto, Mino no kuni (Eiroku:1558) Chu-jo saku KAN2568 TTp103, ¥2M See also http://www.sho-shin.com/sanami.html Nōshū (濃州) is another name for Mino Province. Hope that helps.

Andrew, I thought everything had been cleared by now, but as you ask again: The blade (signed KANEHISA, as far as I can see on pic 3) is probably not handmade but mass produced, not made with traditional TAMAHAGANE steel but with modern cutting tool steel, not water but oil quenched. It has a HAMON, but very likely no NIE, no NIOI, no HADA and no signs of layering construction. It is a WAKIZASHI with bad active rust on the NAKAGO which may conceal production stamps. The photos let me believe that the blade was treated partially with a rotating steel brush which destroys the surface. Very bad idea! Any and all amateur attemps of cleaning, grinding, sharpening, polishing, or restoring will lead to a loss of value - blade and TOSOGU! Natural patina on soft metal parts are important to preserve! So get rid of the rust on the NAKAGO with a pointed piece of horn, ivory, copper, or bone, brush it then with nothing harder than fine brass, and oil it lightly with machine oil of low viscosity. Basically keep the sword dry so no corrosion can take place. Read here at NMB about sword care and real NIHONTO.

Markus, a good story! You should definitely try to become a writer!

Ed, basically I like your TSUBA, especially the SUKASHI. In my eyes, the TEMBO-like dents detract from the beautiful (simple, but refined) design - looks as if someone shot at it with a TEPPO! Perhaps not typically MYOJU....

Andy, welcome to the NMB forums! Without being pedantic, it is a WAKIZASHI. You should do the right things (read here in the respective forums) to stop the active corrosion on the NAKAGO. On the photos, the HAMON looks like those of oil-quenched blades, I think. If I am correct, you probably don't want to invest much money for a traditional polish. Anyway, it is a decorative military item.

Chris, the HITSU-ANA is probably closed with lacquer. That is a traditional way to do.

rsen (please be so kind to sign all posts). the first thing to learn is the NIHONTO vocabulary so that you understand what is meant. It is an exciting subject once you have the bug, so be happy to dive into an interesting new world!

Grimes (is that your name?), to perhaps identify the maker of the blade you could have a small part of the blade (called 'window') polished to see at least HAMON and HADA. How thick is the blade near the MUNE MACHI? How big ist the difference with the thickest part of the NAKAGO? That may give you a rough idea of how often the blade may have been polished and how much metallic substance was lost. In the end $ 600.-- is a lot of money for a blade in this condition, and the mass-produced military mountings do not justify the expense.