Geraint

Hi Dimitri, I bet we all have tales about the one that got away. A sign in a local antique shop points out that you always remember the things you should have bought......., I am also sure that they get better and better as memory plays it's usual tricks. Perhaps a thread for the Itzakaya? Glad that you found a little something to ease the pain though.

Hi Ingrid and welcome. (Forum etiquette is to sign all posts with a real name, by the way.) You don't mention which country you are in which might make a little difference to value but the abumi you show are certainly of interest and some value to collectors. Compare them with the pair that started this thread and you will see some differences, it might help if you could tell if yours are iron or lacquered wood and perhaps some more photographs? Cheers

Hi Mark. So what you have looks to be an interesting civil wakizashi in a gunto saya. This is going to be a personal thing for sure but when the sword arrives check the saya fit with care and see if perhaps it was made for the blade. It is possible that this was simply done to bring the sword sufficiently in line with dress regulations to make it possible for the officer to wear it. Assuming that to be the case then my personal inclination would be to keep the saya as it is as a part of the story of the sword. I know many collectors would want to do what you suggest and swap it out for a new civil style saya so perhaps live with it a little while until you maker your decision. Nice find, I would have had it like a shot if it came up anywhere near me. Enjoy.

Really not my field but toward the bottom of the tsuba, between the nakago ana and the rim, is what looks a little like gomoku zogan. I wonder if the intention was to do this to the whole tsuba but the work was heated a little too high and the applied metals flashed over the surface? It seems unlikely to me that the mimi would be covered so well if this were the case. Just a thought. Cheers

I should have added that according to Fuller and Gregory any sword of this type "must be classified as rare." Best of luck working out a price.

Hi Pablo and welcome. Thomas beat me to the punch. The sword is exactly described in Fuller and Gregory 1996 in the way that Thomas has told you. The single star and the ends of the sun rays on the emblem on the shell guard are distinguishing features that separate it from the earlier 1875 version. The straight blade marks it as for wear with full dress uniform, a more traditional blade shape was worn for field use. Cheers.

Hi Mark. Posted a reply earlier but must have done something stupid as it has gone astray. The catalogue of the Boston Museum Collection is fabulous and a great learning resource so worth saving up for. In the meantime here is a little something from it. In essence Bigelow was born to a wealthy Boston family, trained at Harvard medical school and then went to Paris to the Institute Pasteur to further his studies where he became involved with the craze for 'Japonisme'. He went to Japan for a short visit but ended up staying for seven years. He recognised the quality of Japanese art and craft, also the fact that in the rush to westernise it was being neglected. By influence, patronage of craftsmen and donation toward the establishment of the Juyo|Bijutsu-in he contributed greatly to the appreciation of Japanese art and was awarded the Order of the Rising Sun, Third Class; the highest award available to foreigners. There is a book; "A Short Biography of W. S. Bigelow" written by Yamanaka Sadajiro, probably very hard to find now though SOAS might have a copy. Apparently he donated his collection of some 46,000 items to the Boston Museum between 1911 and his death in 1926. His sword collection was assembled with the advisory assistance of Honnami Koga and the sword dealer Machida Heikichi. The catalogue makes no mention of other parts of the collection but of course Bigelow may have sold items or the museum may have deaccesioned items at some point. Either way the sword has an interesting history. You must be gathering quite a collection by now Mark, enjoy!

Hi Mike, There are people over here who would be happy to look at the sword if that's any help. Couple of board members down here in the far south west at least. Cheers

Hello again Rouse. I agree with Mark, the shape is unusual but known and was made this way as a katana, it is not an altered polearm in this case. The blade style was also made around the time of the earlier smiths signing this way and the rather large kissaki also occurs in early Edo swords as well as shinshinto ones. Bt the by, it looks as if the blade has been shortened, suriage, and the machi, where the habaki rests moved up. Quite a normal procedure for swords. I really like it, you should be very pleased. Cheers

Hello Rouse and welcome. Your sword is in shingunto mounts from WWII with the added feature of a mon of arrow fletchings. The blade is signed Onizuka Yoshikuni. There were several smniths of this name in Chikugo working between 1615 and 1660, one other in around 1865. Hard to be more precise from the images but the sword also appears to be a rather unusual shape which to my mind at least makes it more interesting. Sorry, I have no idea of the value in France but it is colllectable and has value. Please don't try to do anything to the sword other than apply a coat of light oil. It is worth looking after. Hope this helps a little. Al the best.

Here you go Scott. From Christie's, 28th March 1995. Described as, "A pair of Got Ichijo tsuka plates. One of shakudo decorated with a hot punched design of snow flakes and the other of shibuichi similalry decorated, each sealed Ichijop, late Edo period with box. 13cm. The shibuichi plate is of extremely high quality and the pear skin effect of the separation of the two base metals is clearly visible." You will also see the daisho pair of Ichijo tsuba, lot 92, an Umetada shakudo tsuba from the Sasano collection, lot 94 and a shakudo Bushu tsuba, lot 95. Lot 92 sold for £17,250.00, quite a price. The tsuka plates sold for £1,995.00. Again from memory but I can't recall the source, I believe that I have seen metal embossed to resemble same on a sword. All the best.

Hi Scott. Some time ago a pair of tsuka gane were offered for sale in one of the major London auction houses. From memory they were Goto Ichijo work. I will see if I can find the catalogue and scan the image for you. I have never come across them other than that and of course in the type of tachi mount that you illustrate save for some commissioned for a koshirae shortly after the auction.

Dear Edward. I like this one as well as the other. Relatively simple job to replace the horn kashira, polish and there you are. I have read that generally good quality yari are found mounted as tanto but I cannot recall the reference. I have seen one or two in hand and have always found it to be an attractive combination. I own one which is a ryoshinogi yari in aikuchi koshirae, when mounted in it's koshirae it is quite a frightening prospect. Do you plan on having this one polished? If so I am sure we would love to see some pictures. All the best.

Dear all. Tanto fest! Whatever it is I love it. For what it's worth I attach two images; one is of what I would call an aikuchi because of the lack of tsuba, the second is what I have always understood to be a yomeiri tanto. The first has a shin shinto blade signed by Seishin shi Masayuki, the saya is a rather fetching lacquer with aogi used to create a brocade effect and pale horn fittings plus a mini bashin. The second is unsigned and probably Taisho, mu mei blade with hi and a pretty lacquer job on the tsuka and saya. This tanto has no kurikata but it has a bevel on the kashira like the one you posted. This is to make it possible to discern by feel which side the edge is on when the tanto is worn in the folds of a robe. As with most things in the fascinating hobby I am sure there are exceptions and oddities to every rule but what the heck, they are still pretty.

Ah, Thierry. I am surprised that you don't recognise this for what it is; this form of kozuka is often found mounted with a kogatana blade like the one in the attached picture with a companion piece whose blade is rather fork like. A pair of these would be mounted in the saya of a bento tachi mount for use when samurai were going on a picnic. Rather like the so called hunting tachi koshirae.

Don't get excited guys but check out this one. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rare-WWII-Japan ... 233wt_1396

Hi Terry. Not sure what references you have but this mei is listed in Hawley TER117. Date approx. 1673. Pictures of the blade may help confirm this. If this turns out to be the smith he has a 40 point ranking in Hawley which is pretty good. All the best.

Hi George, Thanks for the caveat but don't worry, I'll probably leave well alone. Cheers.

Hi Jim, Never thought of it as odd but here is a picture of one with the two hangers though the lower one shows no sign of being removable as George suggests, must give it a try.

Hello Jim. I am sure Kevin won't mind me posting this link to a sue koto Mihara blade on his site. I look forward to hearing your theories when you have got them to a point where you feel ready to share. http://www.ryujinswords.com/masatsugu.htm I will also look for an article in JSS/US which appeared some years ago on a mumei Mihara wakizashi. All the best.

But just for now, here is a link to a yoroi doshi which exemplifies what we have been talking about. http://www.sho-shin.com/yomit.html

Dear Edward, I too really like this tanto koshirae in terms of its overall design. The most obvious distinguishing feature of a yoroi doshi is it's thickness at the habaki; normal tanto appear to be a normal thickness whereas a yoroi doshi will be significantly thicker at the back edge to make for a much stiffer blade in order to penetrate armour. There is a term for menuki mounted outrside the ito which I am afraid escapes me at the moment though I am sure others will step in with the information. Cheers

Dear Ron. I share your pain, perhaps you should take him on a trip to Don's shop? I can imagine your relief Mark, glad they turned up safe and sound.

Dear Edward. With reference to both your koshirae I will post a couple of photos. Our itomaki tachi might be twins though the fittings on mine are silvered with a gilt edge. I have understood it to be a sword made for the coronation so Ian's observations regarding plain fittings are interesting. The second sword is in 1935 kaigunto koshirae and strangely is also signed Kunihiro though with a nijimei, pretending to be the Horikawa Kunihiro though I believe pretense is as close as it gets. Not too much to add to your knowledge but I thought you might be interested. Regards

Hi Dean. I think the answer to your question is, "Yes." As in, "Yes, it's either Meiji or Showa." According to Fuller and Gregory 1996 it would be the mounted police hanger (shortsword) Type 1. The sword that Eric shows is the Type 2. No date is given for the introduction of the sword, to quote, "Dating of these weapons is uncertain." The sword is similar in design to the 1895 pattern Naval Prison and Shore Patrol sword so perhaps a date around there would be a good guess Fulller and Gregory also observe that the blades in the examples they have seen, "often appear to be contemporayr hand made with a narrow straight hamon of konie." Hope this helps a little.