Geraint

Hi Peter. I am sure there was one some months ago. I will have a look. All the best.

Hi Knowlton. You ask what gives it away as fake and the list is quite large. In the final analysis a long time looking carefully at the real thing trains the eye to spot inconsistencies at a glance. The tsuba and saya fittings are all very poorly cast and don't match genuine shingunto fittings at all, best seen in the crude shaping of the scabbard mouth and the casting faults on the hanger. The habaki is poorly shaped and the front edge is strange. The characters on the tang are wrong as is the way they are cut into the metal, the surface of the tang does not carry the finish you would see on a genuine sword, the carving on the blade is not good and most importantly fills the whole width of the blade, including what should be the very hard steel at the cutting edge, genuine carvings are done in the softer steel of the main part of the blade and not in the hamon. The overall shape of the blade is poor and the kissaki is badly formed. As you can see that is quite a number of features, other fakes are much more subtle and once you get into the realms of spurious signatures on Japanese made swords then it gets even harder. Something about this attracted you, why not have a trawl through the genuine swords displayed on the dealer websites listed at the top of the message board? You will see some beautiful works of art so you are in for a treat, and I am sure you will easily see what separates them from your copy. They are fascinating and I should issue a health warning here, once you start to explore you may find yourself well and truly bitten by the bug. Welcome and have fun! PS Enjoy cutting the coconuts but when you own a real Nihonto please resist that urge. All the best.

Ah, he is a fortunate man! Both tsuba are Japanese which is a start as so much of what you see is reproduction, to be kind. I note a dragon theme, is that important? For what it's worth I like the second rather more though it needs some TLC. I note that the seller only ships to the USA. You might also have a look at this site, http://www.japaneseswordbooksandtsuba.com/ or indeed this one, http://www.ricecracker.com/ May I congratulate you on your anniversary. Best wishes.

Moriyama san; " He had his signature "Echizen- Daijo Minamoto Kunisada", too ", does appear to suggest that the same man used both signatures, is this a mistranslation?

Hi Rob. Well, it was a wakizashi or short sword. The saya and blade probably belonged together, it goes downhill from there I'm afraid. The hilt is a later add on though it looks Japanese. Pure speculation now but perhaps a damaged sword fudged together as a souvenir for a service man. It looks as thought eh copper habaki has been soldered to the blade, and if this is the case then it has likely damaged the blade in collectors terms. I would think this is best preserved as an object of family history in memory of the man who brought it back. All the best.

Come on Brian, I'm sure you know the famous Japanese legend of the praying mantis searching for the flaming pearl?

Woah! More light, less heat. Tom clearly hit a number of buttons with his first post and got predictable reactions from us arising from painful experience, unexpected reactions for a neophyte. Tom, depends on wherabouts you are but there are some easy ways to progress with this. The second photo does show a flaw and it may be serious but the quality of the images makes it hard to tell very much. There are risks with polishing which include the fact that a fatal flaw may show up and you still have to pay the polisher for their work. There are at least two sword societies in the UK and a number of collectors who could advise you. If you would rather not publish your location feel free to PM me, I may be able to make some suggestions for you. The mei, by the way, is very familiar as many Bizen smiths signed this way. Don't give up, enjoy!

So Let's see. Your first three nihonto and it starts to look as though one might be an Echizen Shimosaka wakizashi with horimono in rather spiffy koshirae, one sets out to be an Aoe tachi, also in koshirae and then there's the other one! Wow! Well you certainly need to find some expertise locally and start reading. These are a real find, well done. Can I suggest that you post pictures of the koshirae for the wakizashi in the tosogu section of the board?

Hi Howard. I'm afraid I found the image doing a routine search so no chance of seeing the signature. You would do well to take some good images of the kabuto and posting them here so that the real experts can comment. Good pictures, front elevation, side elevation and plan would allow for some assessment. From what I can tell Munehisa was a late smith working in Kaga, so probably 19th century. All the best. And I see you have already found the Nihon no Katchu board

Yes Gianfranco a little light oil will do no harm. By the bye, board rules are that you sign posts with your name, easy to add in your profile. I really think you should find someone who will give you a hands on assessment but these, particularly the first two, are interesting swords. This could be the start of something big, you may have been bitten by the Nihonto bug and contracted an incurable disease. You are in for a fun time! All the best.

Hi Howard. Others will chime in, far more expert than I but at least I can tell you that it is a suji kabuto. Seems to be 62 plate. Have a look at this among many others: http://www.christies.com/LotFinder/LotD ... ID=4250952 Looks to be refinished, the mon on the fukigaeashi might be Sakai family.

Hi Gianfranco. What a find! If my first three swords had been this good I would have been thrilled. The first has a very good looking koshirae and is a wakizashi as you give it's length, assuming you measured from the tip to the notch on the back of the blade. The koshirae look very good in spite of the damage and I would say well worth restoration. Respectfully disagreeing with Brian I understood umbari to be associated with Higo mounts not Bizen but I am sure more knowledgeable fittings collectors will put us straight on that one. The second sword is interesting because it has tachi mei, extra holes are not uncommon as words are remounted and shortened at the nakago end of the blade. Both these things suggest that this is an old blade and certainly worth showing to somebody in hand who can advise you. I think I can see "Bitchu no kuni" , others may make out more. Fuch and kashira look really good and the presence of foiled seppa and double habaki are usually signs that someone took great care with the mounting. The wire loop at the end of the hilt suggest use in WWII. The third sword has a mounting ring on the scabbard which would probably have had a leather combat cover. Depends where you are but there may be a society near by where you could get some better hands on advice, for now please don't try any cleaning or restoration yourself, members here will recommend people for you who will do good work, perhaps a little light oil on the blades. Have fun.

Might I suggest a nightingale and moon theme?

Presumably a rather nice Burgundy Clive?

Hi Grev. Might be worth having a word with Kevin at Ryujin swords. http://www.ryujinswords.com/ Cheers.

Hi Gheorghe. Why would you want to?

Dear Thierry. Wow! They are gorgeous, I am sure that you enjoyed the process not to mention the results but thank you for sharing these, they are wonderful. Have you thought of publishing a catalogue, something like the Rosin collection one? The copper tsuba, number 61/62, is that a three plate construction? All the best.

Hi Gregor. As no one has replied yet here are some thoughts for you. The sword: Not good. It may be a fake altogether. At the least the nakago is badly done, it pretends to be shortened but everything about it is bad, the grooves in the blade look poor and the whole thing looks suspect, the habaki is not Japanese, though I suspect some of the hilt fittings are but they were never very good. The small ornament on the saya looks good. Bear in mind that showing the sword in hand to someone who knows what they are doing will reveal a lot more. I would walk away from this. The tsuba are better, at least they are Japanese and though condition is not great they might afford you some study. One pair of fuchi kashira looks interesting but your photograph is very blurred. If you are interested then you might look at http://www.japaneseswordbooksandtsuba.com/about to give you some ideas about pricing. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

And indeed John suggest the very same thing at the end of his second paragraph.

Hi Matt, What about the saya? Is it laquered wood perhaps? Also some images of the blade and nakago would be interesting. This looks like a nice sword, you must be pleased with it. All the best.

Speaking of the nakago ana anyone seeing what I am?

Just a thought but you might try bamboo. Because of the relative size of a kogatana tsunagi honoki would be rather weak and I have seen bamboo used. It seems relatively easy to obtain in this country at garden centres and one large sized piece would do you an awful lot of kogatana sized pieces.

Wow! What a beauty! Can I just thank you for sharing these lovely things from your collection, Ed? I for one am really enjoying them. All the best.

Dear Michael. Have you picked yourself off the floor yet? If we are right that the tanto blade is very late and not of great quality then the koshirae is entirely appropriate. The fittings are of a late type commonly encountered though they are very dirty. If you feel like investing in a re wrapped tsuka then you probably ought to think about a polish and this would be good money after bad in the sense that you are still going to be left with a poor quality tanto in poor mounts which will have little appeal for you as you become more accustomed to what good quality blades and koshirae are like. This one is not a keeper, trade it on. All the best. I see my post crossed with Brian's, same thoughts though.

Hi Jeremy. If I have understood you correctly you are thinking that the sword has not been shortened because the colouration of the end of the nakago is the same as the rest? If the whole of th original nakago was removed then naturally the colour of the new one, formed from the surface of the blade would be the same as the end. I cannot see any sign of yasurime on the remaining nakago, not always a certainty as age and handling do tend to reduce these to the point of invisibility. The flat end, more than one mekugi ana and the even finish would suggest a much shortened sword. What length is it now from machi to kissaki? Also have a close look at the end, is that the remains of another mekugi ana or am I making that up? All the best.