Ian B3HR2UH

Hi Paul , I will comment on some of the swords . Donald Barnes was a Victorian collector from the 1970's right through until about ten years ago when ill health affected him . He was a real bower bird and collected anything Japanese from WW2 . He was quite knowledgeable about Japanese militaria and military mountings but wasn't much of a blade man . I doubt that he could read the signatures but this didn't matter too much as his wife was Japanese . He had a big room full of stuff including a Japanese skull which was particularly bizarre given his wifes nationality . Donald didn't have much of an eye for quality though .Most of the older collectors here have Donald Barnes stories . I sold swords to him and a number at the sale were ones that I used to own. Rod Bellars obviously had a huge militaria collection . I saw this about ten years ago . At that time he had lots 503 and 546 along with about thirty other swords . The thirty were all no good ,fake signatures poor condition or poor quality . Rod knew virtually nothing about swords and I had the impression that anything good that he did have had been winkled out of him by those with more knowledge . A friend has a fine Moritoshi that he got from Rod. This was restored and went Tokubetsu Hozon Donald Barnes's health deteriorated and he eventually sold all of his swords to Rod a couple of years ago . Most of the swords at the auction were ex Donald Barnes and I mention all of this to give credit to Donald. Onto the swords. Lot 500. This is a naval kyugunto that I used to own . I swapped it to Donald for another Naval Kyugunto that I still have The blade on the auctioned sword was nice but it had a number of cracks along the shinogi and shinogi ji . These were perpendicular to the cutting edge like hagire but on the shinogi. Like all of these swords the price it sold for was way too high . Lot 503 . As I mentioned above I was offered this by the man who bought it back from the war . He wanted too much so I passed . Rod obviously later bought it . The blade is signed Kaneuji and is dated 1331 which it can never be . I feel sure the blade is a showa fake . Lot 518. For years I wanted to own a " Generals sword " but never found one . Then thirty or so years ago Donald turned this one up ! It has an interesting story . The man who bought it back to Australia was on the Tokyo docks on the day of the surrender on the Missouri . The Japanese surrender party had to take their sword off at the wharf before they were taken out to the Missouri for the formal surrender . Their swords were left in a pile on the dock. The Australian who was there asked the Americans guarding the swords if he could have one and wound up with this one. The sword has a Generals tassel and there is a silver owners name " Hasegawa " on the kabuto gane. There was no officer named Hasegawa who surrendered on the Missouri. A Major General Hasegawa was in command of the Kempetai though The blade is in good condition ,is mumei and probably shin shinto . If not for the tassel and background story I wouldn't keep the actual sword itself . However it is a piece that I have always wanted and I could afford it so I paid what I had to to get it. I wlll write about the other four swords soon . Ian Brooks

Hi Paul , there are swords that were made during the war by the Japanese which have famous makers names on them . Typically they are signed by Kotetsu and have a dragon or other horimono . I once had one in naval mounts with a dragon horimono that was signed Sa Yukihide . I eventually decided that it was a showa era blade with a famous makers name put on it .Others are signed with fictitious makers names usually with a lord of ( kami ) prefix . I imagine the Japanese smiths and dealers could sell these to officers buying a sword , for more than a blade signed with the smiths true name. That is probably overstating it as the blades are most likely factory produced ones. The freshness of the chisel cuts on the Kaneuji signature together with the new looking tang ,lack of forging faults and odd looking tempering make me conclude that it is one of these faked blades . Ian Brooks

Hello Paul , I have seen Captain Ikeda's sword a couple of times over the years and could have had it with a little effort . I was offered it by the man who bought it back from the war. It is signed Kaneuji and dated 1300 odd . My belief is that it is a showa period fake . The mount is interesting though and is the one that I referenced in my piece about the swords from Buka Island . The price that this sword achieved was crazy. The Masanori has promise but you would need to compare the mei with genuine pieces . To me the nakago lacked the colour and crisp well cut mei that you would expect on a better quality shinto piece( which this purports to be ).. Overall this was a good package and worth a punt at the right price Ian Brooks

I saw this myself at the old shop . I walked in and Mr Tsuruta was polishing a tanto . Not with finger stones as I recall. Ian Brooks

Thanks Brian , No I don't believe that there is any such requirement. My understanding is that if I took the piece to Japan I would continue to own it but would not be able to take it back out of the country unless I had received permission to do so before I took it in . When these missing pieces have turned up in the past there has been no push by the Japanese government for them to be returned so I don't think it is an issue The Treaty of San Francisco which was signed by Japan and the US in 1951 contains provisions recognizing the validity of dispositions of property made pursuant to directions of the US Military government . As the swords were handed in on the directions of the occupying forces this treaty , I think , validates our possession of swords handed in during the occupation. Article 19(d) of the treaty also recognizes the validity of all acts and omissions done during the occupation under or in consequence of directives of the occupation authorities ( ie the SCAPIN's requiring the swords to be handed in ) and waives Japans right to take action for those acts or omissions. Ian Brooks

David , your friend didn't get what he thought he was getting . This is horrible. Ian Brooks

Stegel , are you just going to tease us with the one shot of yours ! How about some more photos and details . Ian Brooks

Everything about this sword . other than the mei which is well cut and looks old , points to this being a showa or gendai blade . Ian brooks

I wish that I could claim that it was my photographic memory Bob but it wasn't . Toso Soran has photos of a lot of pieces from private collections so I thought it worth having a look in given the hakogaki. The T indicates that it was in the collection of Tanaka Kunichiro . I have a second copy of Toso Soran so will send you a PM . Ian Brooks

Hi Bob , this piece was in Dr Torigoye's book Toso Soran . I haven't compared the pictures side by side but thought you would be interested to see it .Your picture is much better ! It is a lovely piece. Ian Brooks

Hi Chris , have a look at the Control of Weapons Regulations 2011 , which are on line and also at the Vic Police Control of weapons site . This doesn't fit the definition of a sword any longer . It is probably now a knife, which from memory, is a controlled weapon ( as opposed to a prohibited weapon ) . You can possess this without a licence provided you have a lawful excuse ie to scale fish ,use in the kitchen or to hold a koshirae together . It falls into the same category as your Wiltshire stay sharp knife. Ian Brooks

Whilst the sword is probably gimei ,I think , it would be foolish to remove the mei before you send it to shinsa . There are twelve generations of Yasutsugu so you never know what a Shinsa panel might say . I also think it would be equally foolish to get this repolished . The current polish looks good and a new polish would only be warranted if the mei was genuine . You will never get your polish money back on an unsigned shinto piece where some wally has messed around with both sides of the nakago. Also , unless you have this polished by a Japanese trained polisher then the chances are high that the polish you get back will be worse than what is there now. You have a nice piece take your own advice and leave it alone.. Ian Brooks

It is a crap sword whether it is right or not . The yasurimei look a lot coarser than those in Christian's examples . Ian Brooks

Well done Mark. Perhaps draw peoples attention to the unusual head on the animal . Ian Brooks

It is a fake don't waste your time . If you must try, wrap the blade ( so it is not damaged ) put it in a vice and then use a block of wood and hammer to hit the tsuba . When you have the handle off you will have discovered nothing other to confirm that what you have is a Chinese fake . My best advice is to move it on . Ian Brooks

As usual a lot of discussion about a pretty unworthy object . It looks to me like it was originally a silvered copper or brass tsuba ( or maybe even silver ) like that in the Walters Museum . Someone has glued a leather cover over the body of the tsuba , for some unknown reason , and then popped the shakudo (?) and gilt (?) plate back on the top . Seems to be Meiji or later to me . Ian Brooks

Bob , it is a nice book and if you didn't have many tsuba books then it would be well worth having. However if you have an number of other books by Sato and /or Wakayama then I would give it a miss because much of the contents of Tsuba Kansho Jiten will be in those other books . Ian

Thanks Brian , that worked . Ian

There were at one time some book indexes on the message board site . I can't find them . Are they still here somewhere ? Also does anyone have an index to Toso Kodogu Koza by Wakayama or to Kanzan Token Koza ?

Hi Bob , you asked about Tsuba Kansho Jiten . Like any other book by Sato Kanzan the pieces shown are also in lots of other books . For example there are twenty two tsuba by Kaneiye pictured all of which I am sure could be found in other references . Grey Doffin implies that it contains iron tsuba but there are also plenty of Kinko items shown . There are some pieces though that I don't recall seeing elsewhere such as the unusual one attached . Ian Brooks

Pippo , even if you bought this off a man who bought it back from the islands ( thus knowing it was around in 1945 ) you still have no real way of knowing if it was A) A piece made by the Japanese whilst stationed in the SW Pacific. B ) Something made locally for collaborating local forces C) A " jeep spring " made by Australian or other allies with the intention of selling it to a sucker as the real thing. I have had a number of similar dogs over the years but you just can't tell into which category they fit . The workmanship is so poor that you would assume B) or C) Ian Brooks

Dear Mr. Morita , Thank you for your opinion it is greatly appreciated by me . Would an English translation be along the lines of " This was given at the wish of Lord Yoshisato ( or Lord Yoshitada )" ? or "Gift of Lord Yoshitada" . Your contributions to the board are invaluable and it would be a much poorer place without you. Ian Brooks

Michael , that groove and habaki tell me that this is almost certainly a mass produced late blade that is not even tempered . I would give it a big miss . Something better is sure to turn up . Ian Brooks

Thanks Steve much appreciated . Interestingly there is an habaki with the same gift inscription illustrated in one of Shibata's handbooks . The blade was originally very long but is now suriage and the horimono is now on the nakago. You will enjoy seeing it when you get down here John . A gunto handle but with a hamidashi tsuba on it . All original as I got it off a vet who bought it back from Balikpapan . Ian

I would be grateful for any opinions on the characters on this habaki . The date side I am confident reads Meiji four ( 1871 )(year ? ) Kanotohitsuji hachi gatsu . The other side I am less sure about . I think the right hand column reads Giri Ko , which possibly means a Lords debt of gratitude. The left hand column I am even less sure about but think it reads Kore shitama , which possibly means this permits to commit suicide . Ian Brooks