Ian B3HR2UH

These are the Norishige in Umetada Meikan .

Hello Tobi , I have the catalogue and if you let me know which lot number you are interested in I will send you a copy . Ian

This one has the owners details written on it Ogawa group Army Captain Amano Kojiro

Back in the 1970's when I was buying swords off returned soldiers I saw about four of these in one night . I had no interest in them and made no offers . I guess I could have purchased half of them for twenty dollars each . I feel pretty foolish in hindsight .

Hi Hamish , not a "Festing " sword I am afraid but one of my tsuba was sold at this auction .

Does anyone have the results sheet for Sothebys sale on the 23rd of June 1982 that they could scan and send to me ? Thanks Ian Brooks

I am somewhat skeptical that these are a real daisho and not two similarly themed pieces put together . The workmanship on one looks better than on the other .

Hi Thomas,I have the attached piece which I believe is a gardeners knife or Nata .The blade has a reverse curve in that the cutting edge is on the concave side . I suspect yours is a Japanese gardening implement as well. Ian brooks

Hi Hamish , it looks like a stylised dragon wrapped around a ken . Ian

A collector out here had a good looking daisho pair in " shakudo " nanako with mon on them . To me, on a cursory inspection , they looked good but he submitted them to shinsa and they failed being rejected as modern cast pieces . The coloring on the clouds of this piece looks odd to me . Ian Brooks

I have the attached Kai gunto and the ito on it is completely original so such pieces do exist . However such light binding is highly unusual and with the other red flags it should add up to a warning to avoid the sword . The kabuto gane on the originals generally are made of one metal to which the copper flower parts are soldered ( ? ) on . You can see this on the photo of my piece . The one you are being offered seems to be just the one metal which is I think a bit odd . I wait for others to howl me down on this and show me their pieces where just the one metal is used for the kabuto gane

I would be very suspicious of this piece . As Brian says the habaki is way off and a few other bits raise red flags for me . These coupled with the fact that the other piece the seller has is a Chinese fake leads me to say don't go near it unless you see photos of the nakago

With pictures being submitted by attorneys it looks like you are wanting to sell this and are picking our brains for information ?

This Soten , which is owned by Mishina Kenji , is pictured in the Kokusai Tosogu Kai 8th Exhibition and is described as one Soten's best . I thought it was fantstic and decided to post a copy . Makes you wonder where the others fit into the scheme of things when you see something like this one

The mei / signature is so recently cut that the blade is probably gendai / showa period but certainly no earlier than shin shinto

An octopus on one of my tanto

Absolutely NO chance that this is genuine. My strong guess is that it is a showa era fake .

Hi Vincent , to be very blunt , the piece is a junker which you will probably soon tire of . It has had the stamp removed and been mounted up in crummy old mounts to deceive people into thinking that it is a genuine old Edo period sword .There are much better pieces available out there some of which will not break the bank .

Hi Vincent , it might be a good idea to seek opinions before you buy stuff like this rather than afterwards .

And the bottom fitting is odd

If you are looking to pay that sort of money do yourself a favor and have a serious look at the Kunikiyo katana that is for sale on this site where the price has just been dropped to $4250

Thanks Gents , much appreciated

I was sent the attached pretty rough photo for translation but I am struggling with it. I read the last three characters as Kanesada saku but have done no good with the earlier ones . It seems to be a Showa piece . Does anyone recognise the smith Thanks

Well done Bruce . When you see them all together there can be no doubt about what they are ie clearly NOT made during the war

David , what basis do you have for that statement ? Ian