Shugyosha

Thanks to Paul and Mariusz, you are both very kind. Best, John

From the sugata I'm guessing Keicho shinto. Shinshinto might be another possibility but I think the patina on the tang and the hada is inconsistent with this. I read somewhere the these outsize blades were carried by sumo wrestlers who made a normal sized blade look ridiculously small but that might be apocryphal. In any case a very nice blade. Best, John

What Guido said. There's always the same typo from item to item "midair" for "midari".

Hi Gwyn, Thank you very much for the kind words - I hope that you enjoy your new sword. I've also had a good recent experience dealing with Peter, so I'll take the opportunity to second what you've said about him. Best regards, John

It looks like the nioi guchi falls off the edge of the blade in places. I know this isn't unusual with Muramasa's swords but is it a sufficient negative point for the shinsa team to give it Hozon rather than TH papers? Best, John

I may have it wrong but I thought this sword had been sold off the Board recently?

Hi Axel, The part you aren't sure of is the blade's sori and the kanji that looks like that for ten is "sun". I think the signature on the blade and Torokusho match but the cursive script on the paper makes it hard to read. Best, John

Jean, You're absolutely right. Apologies Brett - go with what Jean said. Best, John

I agree with Stephen - a great plan, well executed. I wish I had a similar direction for my own collecting. Best, John

Hi Brett, I'm not 100% sure about the short one due to the placement of the mekugi ana next to the first kanji but I think it reads Masa Kuni. The longer mei, I believe, reads Dewa Daijo Fujiwara Kunimichi. Again I'm finding the last kanji on the tang hard to read but the one on the Toroku sho is this version of michi 路. Kind regards, John

Hi Joel, Here's a link to a Hizen sword from a little later than yours - Kanbun era started in 1663 or thereabouts so you can see the difference in the patina on the tang on this sword and on yours. http://www.aoijapan.com/katana-hizen-ju-harima-no-kami-fujiwara-tadakuni Unfortunately, I think it's not so much that it is an older blade but that it has had a harder life. A couple of other things to note, the end of the tang on your sword is a different shape to the example, but that might be that it has been shortened (an unshortened katana of this period would normally*be 70cm ish) and for a katana from Hizen you would normally* expect the signature to be on the side facing towards the wearer if worn through the sash on left hip, edge upwards. * Unfortunately with Japanese swords there are some rules and usually many exceptions to them, so this may not mean that it is cut and dried. All that said, it looks like you have a geniune Japanese sword. I'm going to let Jean and Stephen take this on for now as my bed is calling. Kind regards, John

Dear Mr Piffle, I think that you are going to have to post some pictures of the full blade to get anything of use to you: it's not really possible to say too much without more, other than the tang of this blade is overly rusty for the time period and that the signature is unintelligible so no way really of knowing whether it is genuine from the pictures posted. Also, there is a board rule about signing with your personal name rather than your handle (had I known this when I started I would have chosen something different than mine). Otherwise, welcome to the forum and I hope you enjoy it - it is a great place to learn some interesting stuff. Kind regards, John

Sorry Dirk, it was someone else...you've gotta move fast to catch one of Mariusz's tarts. Congratulations to whoever bought it - an interesting sword at a cracking price. Best regards, John

Hi Mariusz, PM sent. Best, John

According to the Nihonto compendium in the research section above, this is the only smith with the title Yamato kami signing Kanenobu, so if everyone has guessed rightly (no disrespect intended) it has a pretty good chance of being correct. A 15 point rating from Hawley indicates, I believe, average skill but it isn't always cut and dried. Have a look at this article on sword smith ratings: http://nihonto.ca/ratings.html Kind regards,

According to the kanji pages, only Yamato and Ousumi provinces begin with the kanji 大. So that might give you a clue as to the province but I got rather less than Peter so unless and until you can get a better photo... Best, John

It's not so much the absence of the stamp - it might have been there originally before the blade was shortened, but that the kanji are written in a completely different style. Also, what I do find a little odd is the four kanji above the mei 秋方家臣 - I would expect the second kanji to be 元 giving Akimoto kashin (a retainer of the Akimoto) for whom he was working from 1774. As it is written, these kanji don't make any sense to me (Akikata kashin) and it would seem odd that a swordsmith working for a particular clan would misspell the clan name, but, I too am learning and usually get these things corrected by those that know better. Best regards, John

Unless I really am going senile, I'm pretty sure that this sword has discussed on the board recently...but I can't turn up the link right now... Some clearer pictures of the jigane might help, but I think I see sumigane near the boshi which might be a pointer towards a real hizen blade...but anyways, it certainly seems to be something more than a wartime blade. Best, John

Hi Chris, I've had a quick look at Hawley's which lists a couple of Yoshiharu's using the kanji on your sword: one in Hoki and the other in Yamashiro, so no obvious connection to Mino there also a quick look through Malcolm Cox's book on Mino To doesn't (obviously) reveal any smiths signing with this mei. As Steve says, the signature does look dodgy but if someone is going to execute a gimei my bet would be that they would pick a famous name rather than one few people have heard of and maybe choose someone who could use a chisel to cut it, so it may be a smith that has escaped the meikan. You could try posting some more pictures of the blade to see if that yields some further information... Best, John

I visited the Stibbert museum last year but was only able to look at what was on display publicly. It is possible to book a private viewing of the Japanese collection but I found this out too late to avail myself of it. Also the collection in general is well worth a look - they have a company of armoured men at arms marching through one hall led by a knight on horseback. Also, they let the public dress up in some of the less valuable pieces of armour: I have a photograph of myself wearing a barbuta and a smaller child than myself was running around in a mail shirt. Well worth a visit.

Hi Gwyn, I'm in Hertfordshire, UK. Best, John

That's the one. I think there's a small kirikomi on the mune, so it has seen some action. I hope that you enjoy it as much as I did. Best regards,

Er...yes. Sorry for the assumption and for misspelling Gwyn's name.

Hi Gwen, I think I used to own this blade, so I'll try to help out within the limits of my knowledge. Unfortunately, there isn't much information beyond the standard form which is pretty much translated on Danny Massey's site. In the third photograph, reading right to left: Kantei sho Nagasa - I shaku 6 bu approximately Item - wakizashi mu mei attributed to monju The next two columns are translated on Nihontocraft except that it is designated "Hozon" as opposed to "Tokubetsu Hozon". Next is the date on which the appraisal was carried out: March 29th in the 18th year of Heisei (2007?). The final column is another standard wording translated on Nihontocraft. On the back of the paper is written the name of the person submitting the sword to the NBTHK and below it the date on which the paper was written up. If I'm right about having owned it previously - it's a lovely little blade with excellent proportions and very attractive hada. Clearly you are a man of excellent taste. Kind regards, John

Hi Grev, I appreciate what you are trying to do with this thread: tsuba aren't my main line of interest and so for me it is always educational when a discussion of the merits of a piece of work takes place, particularly where the more seasoned collectors are involved. Kudos to you for sticking your neck out (something I'm sufficiently cowardly to avoid) as I feel that it's this kind of effort that keeps the forum ticking over. Kind regards, John