Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/13/2025 in all areas

  1. Anthony, I believe the signature is Yoshikuni, and the first two characters (top-bottom) might be E-Saka. 江坂義國. The sword looks to be of wartime manufacture. It’s in nice shape overall with higher quality fittings. Conway
    4 points
  2. Anthony, looks to be YOSHIKUNI 義国: real name Esaka Masao (江坂正男). Born Meiji 33 (1900) May 26. Reg. Showa 17 (1942) August 24 (age 42). (“Esaka Yoshikuni” SEKI) He lived in Gifu, Kamo-gun, Tomita-mura. [Slough p.197]
    3 points
  3. Hello - On September 16, 1945, the Japanese armed forces in Hong Kong surrendered and Major-General OKADA Umekichi handed over his shin gunto to the British naval officer Sir Cecil Harcourt. https://gwulo.com/node/59733/photos-of-person In 2012 I found it in the wonderful National Maritime Museum Greenwich and took the following photographs. It's rare to see a shin gunto (+sword knot!) where a general can be clearly and credibly proven as the owner. Michael
    3 points
  4. Bart, None of this adds up. You can put the matter to bed by sending the sword to shinsa yourself rather than hoping to pass the problem on to the next owner.
    1 point
  5. Anthony: Just to get the ball rolling, I can't speak to the blade but the fittings are from a WWII Naval sword (i.e. kai gunto). John C.
    1 point
  6. Here are some pictures of the guard as well.
    1 point
  7. Thank you all for the kind words! It is a great feeling to read the positive comments.
    1 point
  8. I'd like to announce and thank our members who are going to be assisting us with moderating certain sections. I think it will benefit us all to have more eyes on the forum, and these people have graciously offered to assist with this task. I'll still be looking for one or 2 people to assist with the Izakaya, but finding impartial and fair people who won't take a side is understandably difficult. It's also not something I wish on anyone, but we do need one or 2 people there. Jean will continue to moderate over all sections as before, being the main moderator. The following sections will be assisted with moderation by the following members: General Nihonto Related Discussion: @Scogg (Sam) Translation Assistance: @Ray Singer and @Bugyotsuji (Piers) Auctions and Online Sales: @Scogg Nihonto: @Scogg Tosogu: @Curran Katchu: @uwe Military Swords: @Bruce Pennington and @Scogg Tanegashima: @Bugyotsuji Other Japanese Arts: @Bugyotsuji Sword Shows and Community News: @Mark For Sale/WTB: @Scogg Izakaya: TBA Thanks to these members, please grant them respect, thanks and best wishes.
    1 point
  9. Not Japanese. It's from some other SE Asian country, maybe Burma or Tibet etc. Don't think anyone else signed their swords.
    1 point
  10. All excellent choices.
    1 point
  11. @SouTex Curtis, as noted your mei looks to read "Noshu Seki ju nin Kanemitsu Saku" ( 濃州関住入兼光作) (made by Kanemitsu a person living in Seki in Mino (Gifu)). (The kanji read "seki" looks odd, and more like "warai" 笑 which does not make sense to me, but it was read that way by F&G in 1983). Kanemitsu is a common smith name with at least seven in wartime Seki, but of these only three have this kanji 兼光 and one (Yamada Kanemitsu 1877-1935) died pre-war . Most likely yours is one of these, but probably is Goto who produced some very good work. (examples given). KANEMITSU (兼光) real name Gotō Shōzō (also read as Matsuzo) (後藤 松蔵), student of Kanenaga (兼永), born Meiji 20 (1887) July 20. Registered as Seki smith in early period on Showa 14 (1939) October 26. He became a rikugun-jumei-tōshō and in 1942 Banzuke was ranked as Joko no Retsu (5/7). He died in Showa 32 (1957) March 18. KANEMITSU (兼光) real name Ogawa Mitsuo (小川 光雄), born Taisho 10 (1921) January 20, registered as a Seki smith in Showa 17 (1942) July 3. Worked as a guntō smith. In 1942 Banzuke he was ranked as Ryōkō no Jōi (6/7). He enlisted or was drafted into army and KIA in Showa 19 (1944) July 8 (age 23). Very little info on him.
    1 point
  12. Indeed, AFU translations as well as other translated publications do have mistranslations. And it worked in both directions where somebody's Japanese wasn't quite right or somebody's English wasn't quite right, ending with something getting lost in translation. That, on top of the fact that the study of nihonto is difficult to begin with and translators are sometimes not advanced in their knowledge of nihonto. This is one reason why it is essential to double and even triple check your findings with multiple sources. p.s. this lesson of mistranslations I learned the hard way when it was pointed out by non other than Han Bing Siong in response to a JSS article I had written. A most humbling early experience that taught me to make sure that all the facts were correct, as well as the importance of having a good nihonto library being invaluable.
    1 point
  13. I was about to write same thing as Jacques above. It is sometimes difficult as the romanization can feature lots of various names. I also think the English translation of Fujishiro possibly has a mistranslation in this case, I believe the smith 鎮盛 is read as Shizumori as swordsmith name. Blade that Lex posted is Shigemori 重盛 - however while I cannot find that particular smith anywhere I think the name is plausible as both 盛 Mori and 重 Shige are very common in Bungo signatures. I have lots of books including the Bungo book & Nihontō Meikan, however this particular Shigemori is not found in either.
    1 point
  14. Ujikumo seems to be very rare smith. Unfortunately I can only find this one from my books fast, this is in the collection of Atsuta Jingū and it is Aichi Prefecture Bunkazai. It was dedicated to Atsuta Jingū in 1608. I believe Owari province is written with 尾張 and it turns as Bishū 尾州. Personally I would be cautious about the signature of the blade in the opening post.
    1 point
  15. From what I've found, this sword was sold by a reputable dealer in July 2022 (no papers, nor claim). Then, by April 2023, it was for sale again, this time claiming the papers had been lost by a previous collector... 9 months seems like a short timeframe for getting a sword through shinsha and returned with TokuHo (only to immediately lose the certificate)? The only reference to this mei, that I can find in reference books or on the net, is this sword.
    1 point
  16. This Soten , which is owned by Mishina Kenji , is pictured in the Kokusai Tosogu Kai 8th Exhibition and is described as one Soten's best . I thought it was fantstic and decided to post a copy . Makes you wonder where the others fit into the scheme of things when you see something like this one
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to Johannesburg/GMT+02:00
×
×
  • Create New...