Leaderboard

Bamboo Leaves?

Mountain wasabi by the stream.

Dear All. A late iron one. All the best.

Another Peony . The tsuba is tanto size so is enlarged and a little blurry. Ian Brooks

Not sure if you mean flowers & plants or flowers or plants (or both ) but let's start with these 2 pieces from Suzuki Yoshihiko & Kano Natsuo

From my own collection - the nanako is minute and the design wraps around the nanako mimi - not done in shakudo as one would expect, but shibuichi.

My plants

Here's one from my collection, lilys from the Choshu school.

Here are an early OWARI (?) TSUBA (ex Roger Dundas collection) and a rare KO-UMETADA. Sadly, I don't know what kind of flowers are depicted.

Kiri depiction signed Choshu Kiyoshige

My first ever tsuba, on my inherited katana. A permanent part of my collection

Some of mine

A simple piece from my collection, but my favorite as it was my first. Owned by my grandfather, it was mounted on an officer's sword taken back to the USA after WW2. Damon

A few “non native” plants and flowers currently living in Denmark 🌿🍀 /Soren

Knotweed...(or maybe Wasabi..who knows.)

Sakura clusters

This is one of the best threads in a while.... here is another of my favourites

Read from right to left, 第二千八百七十三号 -> No. 2873 コクラケン -> Kokuraken https://aucview.com/yahoo/j1140802752/ Here, this rifle also had similiar number to yours.

Birds and pine trees. One of my few blinged out pieces…

Another I'm quite fond of

even if the subject is not the blade as such but the blacksmith, and the polishing is old, lack of visibility, I send you some photos. Some nie over the whole length of the blade, quite nice. thanks you gentleman. max

Don't use gun oil on swords. A lot of them have cleaning elements meant to dissolve powder residue, lead, copper fouling etc in them, as well as lubricants that may or may not come off with isopropyl. This applies to things like wd40 and 3 in 1, break free, etc as well. Stick with sword oil or mineral oil.

Hi Jake, Just a few simple things to look at- when you look at goto work you are usually looking at excellent and precise execution. Look at the nanako on a verified goto piece. Compare that with yours and you can see there is a big difference in execution and precision. The precision of design and carving in any design a goto artist does is crisp and flows. Look at your horses, they look a bit muddled in comparison. Not trying to knock your piece, just pointing out a few things that caught my eye immediately. I don't know lot about the Goto school but have overtime come across lots of pictures (wish more in hand). You start to see what goes into a quality piece by breaking down the details. There is a reason why the Goto school is so respected. I am guilty as most, looking at the signature 1st. But we always heard from the "older crowd" that the "workmanship confirms the signature " and I understand why now more than when I first started collecting. Why is this so hard to accept? Simply, it points out how much I don't know. Lol. Best of luck and I'm glad you are enjoying what you have.

One of my low end tsuba! I still think it is great artwork!

I always thought that Choshu is underrated as a tsuba school - they have some magnificent work.

The crown or ball of the tassel is a separate piece that covers the ends of the strings. You can see on the sword below where the crowns have come off.

A charming little Ko-Kinko in my collection, understated but I really like it.

My humble contribution - a classical Kyo-Sukashi with bamboo and iris. Florian

Well back to the armor! I think we are talking about a "Tetsu sabiji nimai-dô gusoku" (russet iron two part-cuirass armor - simplifiyed naming!) with nunome-zogan adornment, might dating back to the latter half of the Edo period. The helmet is a so called "Hoshi-kabuto" (or Koboshi-kabuto)* of rather good quality. Unfortunately the provided pictures don't tell much about the whole. What I can say is that kote (sleeves) and suneate (shin guards) comming from a matching set, but it seems the haidate (apron) is missing. This is also true for the dô (cuirass) and the kabuto (helmet)*. In case of the Jingasa (bajo-jingasa = riding hat) and the ogi (fan), however, we can't be sure... Note, the dô is insofar interesting, that it was made to look like a rokumai-dô (six part cuirass)! A word about the mon (coat of arms) that makes the helmet and the cuirass "matching". The example below is very close and probably related at least to 3 families, namely: 島村氏, 河村氏 and 茅野氏. The names have several readings so I won't go deeper for the time being... * The helmet might be older. It would be nice to have some more pictures (front-, side-, back- and top-view) as also some shots from inside, if the liner (ukebari) allows it?!

Yes, Kokura makes sense. Thanks, Yoon! 1871-1876 https://en.m.wikiped...ki/Kokura_Prefecture

Asarum caulescens (hollyhock) and Paeonia suffruticosa (peony).

Many of the stamps are not clear, so they are to a degree open to interpretation. Usually with these Jinshin registration numbers there is an indication somewhere on the barrel or stock nearby noting the place of registration. If we follow the same direction as the numbers (which go from right to left), then the bottom word makes sense as Kokufu Ken コクフケン. With the Kanji it would be, as I said above, 国府縣 if you use the old kanji 縣 for 県 Ken (prefecture). (Originally I thought it might be ユリフ, but that did not make much sense as I could find no record of such a place.) This would tell you simply that a gun originally made somewhere in Japan was picked up in the great registration of 1872 in Gifu.

Congrats - the boshi I think is typical for Bizen circa 1510-1550, and nothing else contradicts the conclusion, quite a few things are consistent. Unfortunately its not signed but the attribution is likely to be along the lines of Sukesada, Katsumitsu or Kiyomitsu smiths.

@Bruce Pennington Since the navy sword is called "太刀型軍刀" (Tachi-style military sword), I suppose it should have a tachi mei. http://ohmura-study.net/730.html http://ohmura-study.net/284.html 刀身 一、皇國古来ノ太刀又ハ打刀ノ身若ハ皇國獨特ノ鍛錬法ニ據レル新身ヲ用フルコト、洋鋼打延ノモノノ如キハ適當ナラズ 二、刀身ノ長サハ佩用者ノ身長及修得セル劍術流派ニヨリ定ムベキモノナルモ一尺七寸以上ヲ可トス 三、ハバキハ太刀ハバキトシ金、銀、銅又ハ金銀著セノ何レニテモ差支ナク鑢目等モ随意ノコト

Here Hozon does unusual thing - identifies the period and the province and the name. This suggests to me its not a Meikan smith, but they felt he is important enough to identify correctly rather than just say "worthy of preservation, shinto Hirofusa". When did he work - is a good question, boshi and sugata can help. It could be that one can see Tegai elements here - nijuba etc, but first its done in itame blade, second its structured a bit differently - as a large, well defined gap within the hamon, something which became really popular with Inoue Shinkai, its possible this blade is 1660-1700. Also I think one can consider options its a style of Hizen rather than Hizen province proper.

Paulowinas in open work

Just to complete the story, I passed on my thoughts on the collection in a detailed reply to the curator. I thought given the limited funds available the museum should know what they have and that many of the pieces are not what they purport to be. eg the signed Yukihira tanto. The Masamune is worth more detailed inspection but in light of the entire collection, its highly unlikely to be a real Masamune. Perhaps another Soshuden Masterwork piece and that if the museum wanted they could have a trained togishi open up a window to expose the jihada and hataraki. If worthy of a full polish to have it returned to Japan for a high end mukansa polish. In its current state almost impossible to glean any further insight. I'm guessing the Curator didn't appreciate the feedback and never responded...... but better to know right. Btw a preeminent expert inspected another sword, which wasn't at the Steyr museum when I visited, and signed Sadamune. He says that was also Gimei.

An OWARI TSUBA with Pawlownia leaves and a KYO-SHOAMI with bamboo and sparrows

Not sure why this one really appeals to me but it’s a favourite. Large katana, old plum blossom stump before the moon. Maybe because it suggests “there’s life in the old dog”🙂🙂

Well Simon, Eldreds auctions sold one for $169 [including fees] in 2012 so your $25 was better than that! You notice the "mushroom" top is a constant feature, the "signatures" [fake] are added later and can vary even in who they pretend to be by. https://www.eldreds.....-with-re_BEB03ED54F

What a wonderful response. It's hard to argue against your thought process and to not think in probabilities. I especially echo your nostalgic reference to Darcy. His educated and insightful contributions are sorely missed.

This one should be Gotō Seijō (後藤清乗). But maybe not authentic, as you mention.

For signatures I would guess 1. 兼貞 - Kanesada 2. 備州長船XX / 天正XX年八月日 - Bishū Osafune XX (c.1573-1592), cannot identify smith or year with certainity. 3. 越前国下坂貞次 / 大和大掾藤原正則 - Echizen no Kuni Shimosaka Sadatsugu / Yamato no Daijō Fujiwara Masanori 4. 行平作 / Yukihira Saku

Congratulations Piers. It's certainly the same compared to the tang that Jacques showed us. Picking up a sword in a book is a rare luck.